Where is the outrage

03 Jul 2016 17:52 #1 by ramage
Where is the outrage was created by ramage
AG Lynch meets with Bill Clinton for 30 minutes privately. The Clinton Foundation is under investigation by FBI. Hilary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI. What am I missing?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Jul 2016 20:00 #2 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Where is the outrage
Scandal fatigue? Or these stories come out when the press and America are on vacation?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Jul 2016 08:24 #3 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic Where is the outrage

ramage wrote: AG Lynch meets with Bill Clinton for 30 minutes privately. The Clinton Foundation is under investigation by FBI. Hilary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI. What am I missing?

The Clintons make their own rules and both have a history of lying the American people. As for Lynch, I knew she was really biased but I had no idea she was that stupid.

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Jul 2016 08:28 #4 by intheaspens
Replied by intheaspens on topic Where is the outrage
Just another day in DC for our esteemed oligarchy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 10:46 #5 by ramage
Replied by ramage on topic Where is the outrage
Stephen Green @VodkaPundit
BREAKING: FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.
9:24 AM - 5 Jul 2016

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 13:11 #6 by ramage
Replied by ramage on topic Where is the outrage
From ZeroHedge.com:

What is even more shocking is that according to Comey, "we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

Well, we did. Here is the FBI itself, less than a year ago, charging one Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, who pleaded guilty to "unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials" without malicious intent, in other words precisely what the FBI alleges Hillary did (h/t @DavidSirota):

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.

According to court documents, Nishimura was a Naval reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In his role as a Regional Engineer for the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers. Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. In the United States, Nishimura continued to maintain the information on unclassified systems in unauthorized locations, and copied the materials onto at least one additional unauthorized and unclassified system.

Nishimura’s actions came to light in early 2012, when he admitted to Naval personnel that he had handled classified materials inappropriately. Nishimura later admitted that, following his statement to Naval personnel, he destroyed a large quantity of classified materials he had maintained in his home. Despite that, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Nishimura’s home in May 2012, agents recovered numerous classified materials in digital and hard copy forms. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.

This case was the product of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Jean M. Hobler prosecuted the case

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 13:32 #7 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic Where is the outrage
The system is rigged!
The law does not say that you have to "intend" to break the law. The law does not make exception for the incompetent government official. The law does not make exception for poor judgement.

Although, the fact that Hillary had the private server shows intent.

The head of the FBI just demonstrated that he is a political animal after he listed the criminal acts that Hillary did.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 13:42 #8 by intheaspens
Replied by intheaspens on topic Where is the outrage
The rule of law no longer exists in this country. Act accordingly.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 14:57 #9 by hillfarmer
Replied by hillfarmer on topic Where is the outrage
That is simply absurd.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Jul 2016 16:46 - 05 Jul 2016 16:47 #10 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic Where is the outrage
That is NOT absurd. Hillary broke the law, as Comey said and he listed her felonies. Then he said that she should not be indicted.

Comey said that we will not follow the rule of law.

How is the recognition of this an absurdity?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.163 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+