Setting a precedent of not voting on a Supreme Court nominee in the same year as a Presidential election so voters have the opportunity to "choose" who is likely to be nominated based on which presidential candidate wins the election? Fine. I'm okay with that.
Change the rules because it was the other party back then but your party now? That's f***ed up and a ticket to angering every Unaffiliated voter, a good number of moderates, and anyone who believes in fairness and the same rules being applied to all.
February 13, 2016 (342 days prior to election): “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice,” McConnell said in a statement released after Scalia’s death. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”
Result: not a single confirmation hearing held for President Obama's nominee Merrick Garland
September 18, 2020
(46 days prior to election): "President Trump's nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate."
The same day Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies. Before her funeral services have even been held.
Does this piss you off? If so, help him get voted out. Donate to his opponent, Amy McGrath: veteran, Democrat, non-incumbent.
amymcgrath.com/
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
It was expected especially after the PA and MI decisions to cheat on the election. If we could be guaranteed a free and fair election, I’d be right there with you but when a Trump wins and then enough ballots are “found” later to overturn the result, it will be open civil war anyway.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Google ballot harvesting or I can do it for you when I have more time. Look at how many house races there were in 2018 where a Republican was ahead on Election Day only to flip days or weeks later after ballots were “found”. I know you’ll jump to media articles that all say eerily similar versions of the same thing - voter fraud doesn’t exist. As to that, I would refer you to George Orwell.
And the FOURTH TURNING now has a classic catalysis......THIS is the moment when ''WE WILL RISE''
becomes a reality....watch what happens within the coming months.
History Is on the Side of Republicans Filling a Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020
By DAN MCLAUGHLIN
August 7, 2020 2:48 PM
For SC,
Mollie
@MZHemingway
You can disagree with the McConnell rule, which was previously known as the Biden rule, but you should describe it accurately. It's no confirmations in a presidential election year *when senate and presidency are held by different parties.* Doesn't apply this year.
9:42 PM · Sep 18, 2020