- Posts: 25690
- Thank you received: 144
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
[/b]Rick wrote: Defining a woman using factual human biology would be a different definition than the non-scientific radical left would use. The first being an absolute definition based on DNA and internal organs while the other would be based on nothing more than feelings.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LOL, so you are supporting a binary model of men and women?homeagain wrote:
[/b]Rick wrote: Defining a woman using factual human biology would be a different definition than the non-scientific radical left would use. The first being an absolute definition based on DNA and internal organs while the other would be based on nothing more than feelings.
Oh but Grasshopper, u have much to understand.....men r logic based (collectively),while the female species is emotional motivated (collectively)...yes there r exceptions,as with everything in life...the female species is complex because of estrogen,the male species is testosterone based ..".do NOT let them see u sweat" Is the mantra. for men. women have spent useless hours of their lives ATTEMPTING to get their mates to express their true feelings...the man thinks she wants a solution or answer to a problem, when all she REALLY WANTS is to be heard and understood.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
That's the way I look at it, with a fairy princes on one end of the scale and Thor the god of war the other end and everyone else is on a sliding scale in between. But even that is too simple when you add in the color wheel.FredHayek wrote: LOL, so you are supporting a binary model of men and women?
Your fellow liberals support instead a spectrum model of humanity, where everyone is partially male and partially female.
Example, Caitlin Jenner would be 55% male, 45% female. (Best guess)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
You say I have much to learn yet your description is based on what I said, FEELINGS.homeagain wrote:
[/b]Rick wrote: Defining a woman using factual human biology would be a different definition than the non-scientific radical left would use. The first being an absolute definition based on DNA and internal organs while the other would be based on nothing more than feelings.
Oh but Grasshopper, u have much to understand.....men r logic based (collectively),while the female species is emotional motivated (collectively)...yes there r exceptions,as with everything in life...the female species is complex because of estrogen,the male species is testosterone based ..".do NOT let them see u sweat" Is the mantra. for men. women have spent useless hours of their lives ATTEMPTING to get their mates to express their true feelings...the man thinks she wants a solution or answer to a problem, when all she REALLY WANTS is to be heard and understood.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.