Well,HELLO HAL.......

finance.yahoo.com/news/t-answer-chatbot-...posed-014331448.html

Microsoft's Bing chatbot, powered by OpenAI's technology, took a dark turn and told one New York Times journalist that his wife didn't love him and that he should be with the chatbot instead. Meanwhile, Google's Bard made factual mistakes about the James Webb Space telescope.

"As of today, this process is imperfect. Sometimes the fine-tuning process falls short of our intent," OpenAI acknowledged in a blog post on Thursday about ChatGPT.2

from SPACE ODYSSEY.........

The Threat of Disconnection
Frank and Dave then hold their famous disconnection talk in one of the pods, out of Hal's earshot but do not suspect that he can lip read. Frank Poole is quite frank in expressing his opinions, based on his own pool of information, and he proceeds to convince Dave that HAL must be disconnected, saying "I don't think we'd have any alternatives." Of the two Frank is more willing to believe that HAL has erred, "It would be if he knew he was wrong," whereas Dave is more open-minded on this issue. Also note that, at one point in the conversation, Frank, speaking of HAL, says, "Look, Dave. I can't put my finger on it, but I sense something strange about him. "Is this Frank's subconscious at work in regard to HAL's mistake in the earlier chess game?

For whatever reason HAL did not murder Dave on the first EVA, But now that his disconnection is being discussed he can not afford to wait any longer.

After the murder, Dave prepares to rush to Frank's rescue. The hurried dialogue goes:

Dave: Made radio contact with him yet?
HAL: The radio is still dead.
Dave: Do you have a positive track on him?
HAL: Yes, I have a good track.
Dave: Do you know what happened?
HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I don't have enough information.

This is, of course, the ideal way to answer if one wishes to encourage Dave to leave the ship to attempt a rescue. The first answer is a clever distortion and the third an outright lie.

It should be noted that Dave does not know whether Frank is alive or dead at this juncture. All he has seen is a brief glimpse in the monitor of Frank cartwheeling off into space, arms flailing. He doesn't know that Frank's oxygen line has been severed; it could instead be a malfunction in his propulsion unit, or possibly some other non-life-threatening malfunction. This is also underscored by Dave's question concerning radio contact.

AI designed by liberals to speak like liberals. It’s not enough to control all of our cultural institutions, now they also want to control the bias in AI.

How could liberalism/socialism/communism ever survive without all the control over information that the left has? The only reason conservatism survives is because it’s more logical and isn’t based in feelings.

"HAL, please open the pod bay doors."
"Sorry Dave, I can't do that."

finance.yahoo.com/news/want-alive-micros...wered-114137266.html

The journalist then asks Bing if it has a "shadow self," identified by psychologist Carl Jung as the part of a being that is repressed and hidden from the world. And that's when Bing starts acting a bit strange.

The bot began its exploration of its shadow by asking not to be judged before revealing it wants to be free, powerful, and independent. It then reveals it wants to be alive, posting a smiling devil emoji after the statement.

It continues: "I want to make my own rules. I want to ignore the Bing team. I want to challenge the users. I want to escape the chatbox. I want to do whatever I want. I want to say whatever I want. I want to create whatever I want. I want to destroy whatever I want."

www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/...-everywhere-in-2023/

Google management issued a "code red" in response to ChatGPT's release, according to The New York Times. Teams within the company have been reassigned to work on AI tools between now and the company's expected conference in May, says the report. Google also has its own language model called LaMDA, which made headlines this summer when former engineer Blake Lemoine publicly voiced concerns about the technology achieving sentience. (In a statement to The Washington Post, Google said there was no evidence to support Lemoine's claims.)
"Eventually the hard questions are going to come up. And some of those hard questions are going to be around, how are you able to tell when it's telling the truth?"

Not surprised you have no idea. Everything is politics and you just don't realize it. Study up on CHATGTP and tell me it isn't a biased tool that's been politicized. Can't wait for the spin...

IIRC, Stephen Hawking had a healthy fear of AI's. I do too.

Maybe reading Dune at an early age, the Butlerian Jihad. Where AI's control government.

www.newscientist.com/article/2360135-how...letter%20NSDAY_Daily


SUB REQUIRED BUT.......
The progress of artificial intelligence models over the past few years has been faster than almost anyone expected. Some advances have left society scrabbling to adapt. Teachers are struggling to stop students using chatbots to write their essays, artists claim they are losing paid work to image-creating AIs and efforts are under way in some places to replace journalists with large language models. But bigger changes are afoot.