And this: ATTENTION:
iT HAS BEEN WIDELY DISSIMINATED THROUGHOUT THAT THERE WILL BE AN INTERVIEW WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN TODAY.
This interview which appears to be innocuous on the surface is likely to be charged with Russian disinformation. Our team is uniquely qualified to withstand this type of harmful attack though decades of experience. When COVID came, everyone rightfully wore a mask. In the same way it is now imperative that you mask your mind to protect it. Some of what you hear might even be unlawful, depending on where you are at the time.
This is why you need to put your future in the hands of CNN. At CNN we have the most qualified experts assembled to bring this highly touted interview to your living room. We take all the risks, so you do not place yourself in the line of fire. This is what we do all day long in the most unselfish manner.
At CNN we care deeply and urge you to play it safe and only get your news from CNN. There has never been a more important time in your life than the risk that you could be exposed to today. Save your health, save your mind and do not take the chance of getting arrested. Let our CNN team safely listen to the interview and deliver the contents safely to you, with any mind control effec
ts removed. In this dangerous world, make CNN your sole source news provider. Be alert, be informed and stay protected, watch CNN.
Let Putin speak. If he feels more at ease with Tucker, he is more likely to let slip important information or even free American hostages currently being held like the WSJ reporter.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Or perhaps, and this is more likely, Putin can easily manipulate Carlson, like Trump could. Don't expect any hardball questions from Tucker. I'm sure Putin views this interview as an opportunity to get his propaganda out to the gullible, i.e., MAGA.
Other reputable news source have been attempting to interview Putin since the beginning of the invasion. Why won't he give an interview to a real journalist?
If you do not think that Tucker Carlson is not a journalist rather an entertainer please enlighten us as to your definition of a journalist.
I find it humorous that you chose to cite the opinion of Fox News as a credible source. As is said in the Navy, "any port in a storm."
From your citation:
"Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers"
Also find the complete title of the NPR citation:
"You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers"
I await you comments relying on other "far right sources" as you have said, "" in order to justify a position that has no substance.
koobookie wrote: Fox itself says you can't trust Tucker.
Fox lost a lot when they let Tucker go, so why would they ever say anything good about him?
As for the interview, how can you make a judgement without actually watching the interview?
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Evidently you did not read your own citation Kooobookie. The NPR aricle relies solely on Fox News, yet yoou have told us innumerable times that Fox News is right wing propaganda.
Good to see that you are accepting the point of view of Far Right news.
