- Posts: 4630
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Pineguy wrote: As you may or may not know, the White House has NEVER released these numbers because they involved presidential security. This has been the case through various presidents of both parties. It is the policy of the Secret Service.
What's interesting to me is these questions of costs never came up when your glorious leader, George Bush was president and traveling abroad. Why is that?
Another thing that seems to have escaped your remarkable intelligence -- any military used for security are being paid anyway, regardless of where they are stationed.
If this is such a big concern to you, why not contact one of your favorite conservative politicians and ask them to look into it. So far, the only outrage over this appears to be coming from right-wing Bloggers and Neanderthal right-wing posters trying to stir up something.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Well, seeing as how they're announcing "trade deals worth billions", I think we can assume that it was enough of a priority trip to BRING MONEY BACK INTO the US... But then, you guys are more interested in bashing him than acknowledging that he did something to improve the trade deficit.
Oh, wait.... That hasn't shown up on FauxNews yet...so it must not be true.
The White House further clarified that U.S. agencies would apply the criteria and revise the lists of munitions and dual use items that are controlled for export so that they are “tiered” to distinguish the types of items that should be subject to stricter or more permissive levels of control for different destinations, end-uses, and end-users.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
G-20 fallout: Trade barriers, tensions could rise
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Joe wrote: finance.yahoo.com/news/G20-fallout-Trade...&pos=8&asset=&ccode=
Looks like we are getting our moneys worth out of this trip after all. Go Obama and Bernake!
G-20 fallout: Trade barriers, tensions could rise
"The Group of 20 meeting of leading rich and developing nations ended Friday in South Korea with no solutions to longstanding tensions over trade and currency"
"The U.S. couldn't persuade other countries to pressure China to stop manipulating its currency or limit their own trade surpluses and deficits. The Americans faced charges of doing some currency manipulation of their own by pumping $600 billion into their economy."
"The summit was a diplomatic setback for the United States. China was supposed to be the villain of the G-20 meeting."
""Basically, what happened was a diplomatic coup for China," says William Cline, senior fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics. A few months ago, countries from Brazil to Germany were criticizing Chinese trade policies. "Fast-forward, and now China and Germany and Brazil are blaming the United States for causing currency problems.""
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
residenttroll wrote: Don't worry we have another $ 400 billion to go.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Joe wrote: finance.yahoo.com/news/G20-fallout-Trade...&pos=8&asset=&ccode=
Looks like we are getting our moneys worth out of this trip after all. Go Obama and Bernake!
G-20 fallout: Trade barriers, tensions could rise
"The Group of 20 meeting of leading rich and developing nations ended Friday in South Korea with no solutions to longstanding tensions over trade and currency"
"The U.S. couldn't persuade other countries to pressure China to stop manipulating its currency or limit their own trade surpluses and deficits. The Americans faced charges of doing some currency manipulation of their own by pumping $600 billion into their economy."
"The summit was a diplomatic setback for the United States. China was supposed to be the villain of the G-20 meeting."
""Basically, what happened was a diplomatic coup for China," says William Cline, senior fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics. A few months ago, countries from Brazil to Germany were criticizing Chinese trade policies. "Fast-forward, and now China and Germany and Brazil are blaming the United States for causing currency problems.""
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.