God and Liberalism will forever be at odds

Scruffy wrote:

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote: Fine, give me your house, your car and all your money. I need it. If you really think that is what it means then give it to me. :bash :bash

I'm not a Christian, so I don't have to obey the Bible. You're a Christian, but don't obey the Bible.

I continue to pray for you. I don't obey the Bible either. I obey God.

You do realize that Christians view the Bible as God's written word, don't you?

Yea, but libtards see it as just a book of stories, I see it as God is speaking to me. Big difference. Any yes, I have my failings and flaws. Thank God for accepting me for who I am and the choices I have made and repented for.

I'll bet Jesus really likes you using the term "libtards." Have you already repented for insulting your fellow humans?

libtards is a word - just like the word Christian. I am doubtful that it's sin to say "libtard" about someone who accurately fits the definition. It's insulting that you question a person's faith. Who do you repent to?

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote: Fine, give me your house, your car and all your money. I need it. If you really think that is what it means then give it to me. :bash :bash

I'm not a Christian, so I don't have to obey the Bible. You're a Christian, but don't obey the Bible.

I continue to pray for you. I don't obey the Bible either. I obey God.

You do realize that Christians view the Bible as God's written word, don't you?

Yea, but libtards see it as just a book of stories, I see it as God is speaking to me. Big difference. Any yes, I have my failings and flaws. Thank God for accepting me for who I am and the choices I have made and repented for.

I'll bet Jesus really likes you using the term "libtards." Have you already repented for insulting your fellow humans?

libtards is a word - just like the word Christian. I am doubtful that it's sin to say "libtard" about someone who accurately fits the definition. It's insulting that you question a person's faith. Who do you repent to?

But you use the word "libtard" specifically to insult someone that has a different political ideology from you. Do you really think that Jesus would use that word?

probably, why wouldn't He? Now, your resorting to "what if's". scruffy...come on..this is what I am talking about. Your not a Christian but are asking questions about what Jesus would speak...did the devil make you say that? Just wondering? I am using your logic my friend.

outdoor338 wrote: probably, why wouldn't He? Now, your resorting to "what if's". scruffy...come on..this is what I am talking about. Your not a Christian but are asking questions about what Jesus would speak...did the devil make you say that? Just wondering? I am using your logic my friend.

No, you're using your own form of spin logic. Would Jesus insult someone as casually and relentlessly as ResidentTroll does? I seriously doubt it. It seems to me that if you call yourself a Christian, you should follow the words of Christ, which are written in the Bible. You would want to emulate the deity that is the foundation of the religion. In my book, that would mean being nice to people, not insulting them because they are different, but rather, be accepting of people even though you have differences. If someone were to repeatedly, and knowingly, violate the principles of their faith, then I would question the sincerity of their faith.

It can be cumbersome to refer to someone as:

A libtard wants to live in a fantasy world (in which life is the way that they WISH IT WAS) as opposed to dealing with life the way it actually is.

(This explains the religious fervor that many of them demonstrate when it comes to smoking pot).

The most idealistic libtard envisions a time when science/technology and Socialism will eliminate all poverty, hunger, war, disease, injustice, unemployment and prejudice. (It is a nice pipe dream but human nature will forever stand in the way of that goal).

Most libtards subscribe to the notion that "people are basically good", and build their foundation for activism and "improving the human condition" on that faulty premise. Because they deny the facts about human nature, their "reasoning" is diametrically opposite to common sense (blue states vs. red states).

The reality that people have different initiative levels, are basically selfish, and often work for their own interests before helping others, puts a libtard's panties in a wad. So, when citizens will not voluntarily comply with various libtard prescriptions for "the common good", then laws must be passed, or force used, to MAKE them comply. (It is the gradual path to totalitarianism).

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=libtard&defid=1454864


The use of the modern term Libtard, like the use of many words, is an appropriate and efficient way to express meaning.

You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Scruffy wrote:

outdoor338 wrote: sure scruffy, it also says not to argue with fools, so, we Christians may see you as a fool..sometimes it appears so...that's in the Bible you know!

Okay, Outdoor, then tell me - How do you reconcile that Jesus was more socialistic than he was conservative? You started this thread, saying that God and Liberalism will be at odds forever. How do you say that while in Matthew and Luke tell you to give away your possessions to anyone who asks?

Are you kidding? I leave for a bit and this Liberal is still clinging on to this? I already explained it. Anyone with an IQ over 10 knows that God is not telling people to give away everything to everyone who asks to the point of poverty so you can no longer support yourself and your family and help others. It is symbolic of how if you can, you should help those who need it. It doesn't say give away everything and live on the street, become a liberal, ask for it all back and expect others to take care of you. Wow are you a slow one!

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Maybe you are right to a point but even Christians have a limit and breaking point of frustration when dealing with Satan's minions.

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

outdoor338 wrote: sure scruffy, it also says not to argue with fools, so, we Christians may see you as a fool..sometimes it appears so...that's in the Bible you know!

Okay, Outdoor, then tell me - How do you reconcile that Jesus was more socialistic than he was conservative? You started this thread, saying that God and Liberalism will be at odds forever. How do you say that while in Matthew and Luke tell you to give away your possessions to anyone who asks?

Are you kidding? I leave for a bit and this Liberal is still clinging on to this? I already explained it. Anyone with an IQ over 10 knows that God is not telling people to give away everything to everyone who asks to the point of poverty so you can no longer support yourself and your family and help others. It is symbolic of how if you can, you should help those who need it. It doesn't say give away everything and live on the street, become a liberal, ask for it all back and expect others to take care of you. Wow are you a slow one!

Symbolic? It states very clearly, in black & white, what yo should do. Where does it say that it is symbolic only? Look it up in the Bible, Viking, it's right there. Then tell me where in the Bible that I should interpret things as I see fit? Where does it say that I get to pick and choose the portions of the Bible to follow?

Anybody with an IQ over 10 should be able to answer that.

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Maybe you are right to a point but even Christians have a limit and breaking point of frustration when dealing with Satan's minions.

Are you saying that liberals are Satan's minions? Because I know a lot of liberal Christians and it sure would be a shock for them to learn that they are part of Satan's army.