God and Liberalism will forever be at odds

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Maybe you are right to a point but even Christians have a limit and breaking point of frustration when dealing with Satan's minions.

Are you saying that liberals are Satan's minions? Because I know a lot of liberal Christians and it sure would be a shock for them to learn that they are part of Satan's army.

Did I say ALL Liberals? Or just the ones fighting Christians right now with very flawed rationalizations. On fact did I even use the word or infer in any way I meant Liberals?

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Maybe you are right to a point but even Christians have a limit and breaking point of frustration when dealing with Satan's minions.

Are you saying that liberals are Satan's minions? Because I know a lot of liberal Christians and it sure would be a shock for them to learn that they are part of Satan's army.

Did I say ALL Liberals? Or just the ones fighting Christians right now with very flawed rationalizations. On fact did I even use the word or infer in any way I meant Liberals?

That's why I asked the question. Here's another one: do you think that those (liberals) that are "fighting" Christianity with their questions (your term 'flawed rationalizations') are fighting or just seeking answers to the contradictions they see? Because if you answer the questions I posed a few posts up, then I think your rationalizations will become clear.

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

Maybe you are right to a point but even Christians have a limit and breaking point of frustration when dealing with Satan's minions.

Are you saying that liberals are Satan's minions? Because I know a lot of liberal Christians and it sure would be a shock for them to learn that they are part of Satan's army.

Did I say ALL Liberals? Or just the ones fighting Christians right now with very flawed rationalizations. On fact did I even use the word or infer in any way I meant Liberals?

That's why I asked the question. Here's another one: do you think that those (liberals) that are "fighting" Christianity with their questions (your term 'flawed rationalizations') are fighting or just seeking answers to the contradictions they see? Because if you answer the questions I posed a few posts up, then I think your rationalizations will become clear.

I've answered a few times already and am not going to continue to feed into your baiting. And yes I think you are just looking for arguments rather than answers. It is very clear.

Well, it's clear to me that you do not want to look closely at whether your faith and your politics are in agreement. I've stated that I do not think they do and have provided quotes from the Bible which would show that Christianity and conservatism cannot be reconciled.

And no, you have not answered these questions:

Symbolic? It states very clearly, in black & white, what you should do. Where does it say that it is symbolic only? Look it up in the Bible, Viking, it's right there. Then tell me where in the Bible that I should interpret things as I see fit? Where does it say that I get to pick and choose the portions of the Bible to follow?

It's too bad that you get upset when someone questions your faith.

Scruffy wrote: Well, it's clear to me that you do not want to look closely at whether your faith and your politics are in agreement. I've stated that I do not think they do and have provided quotes from the Bible which would show that Christianity and conservatism cannot be reconciled.

And no, you have not answered these questions:

Symbolic? It states very clearly, in black & white, what you should do. Where does it say that it is symbolic only? Look it up in the Bible, Viking, it's right there. Then tell me where in the Bible that I should interpret things as I see fit? Where does it say that I get to pick and choose the portions of the Bible to follow?

It's too bad that you get upset when someone questions your faith.

Not upset at all. And I know that 100% Christianity and Conservatism go hand in hand. Unlike Liberalism which teaches slothfulness, stealing, begging, forcefully taking from others and then giving THEIR money away and taking credit for it which is greed, lying and pride. Teaching that Personal Responsibility is not important is the Liberal way. Conservatives on the other hand teach that Personal Responsibility is a Christian and biblical way of life. All you are doing is baiting and repeating tired lines on here which we have morre than debunked. So I have many more important things to do than play your games on here. I know my faith and it will not be waivered and it is strong.

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: Well, it's clear to me that you do not want to look closely at whether your faith and your politics are in agreement. I've stated that I do not think they do and have provided quotes from the Bible which would show that Christianity and conservatism cannot be reconciled.

And no, you have not answered these questions:

Symbolic? It states very clearly, in black & white, what you should do. Where does it say that it is symbolic only? Look it up in the Bible, Viking, it's right there. Then tell me where in the Bible that I should interpret things as I see fit? Where does it say that I get to pick and choose the portions of the Bible to follow?

It's too bad that you get upset when someone questions your faith.

Not upset at all. And I know that 100% Christianity and Conservatism go hand in hand. Unlike Liberalism which teaches slothfulness, stealing, begging, forcefully taking from others and then giving THEIR money away and taking credit for it which is greed, lying and pride. Teaching that Personal Responsibility is not important is the Liberal way. Conservatives on the other hand teach that Personal Responsibility is a Christian and biblical way of life. All you are doing is baiting and repeating tired lines on here which we have morre than debunked. So I have many more important things to do than play your games on here. I know my faith and it will not be waivered and it is strong.

Show me where you debunked them. Quote yourself or someone else on this board that shows me where they have been debunked.

Thanks for not answering the questions, while at the same time misrepresenting the liberals.

Scruffy wrote:

stupidisonanutmeghigh wrote:

Scruffy wrote:

outdoor338 wrote: sure scruffy, it also says not to argue with fools, so, we Christians may see you as a fool..sometimes it appears so...that's in the Bible you know!

Okay, Outdoor, then tell me - How do you reconcile that Jesus was more socialistic than he was conservative? You started this thread, saying that God and Liberalism will be at odds forever. How do you say that while in Matthew and Luke tell you to give away your possessions to anyone who asks?

Cheerfully giving away my possessions is different from taking. Socialism takes.

Actually, socialism does not take. It is a form of common ownership.

Wow do you need to study up on things. Jesus was totally opposite of a socialist by the way. He never FORCED others to to give away their posesions to give to others. He never FORCIBLY took from others who he felt had enough and gave it to others. Jesus taught personal responsibility and helping others out of the kindess of your your heart and because we should love everyone and WANT to help them. Liberals use Socialism and FORCING everyone to give to others. And with that comes teaching that personal responsibility is no big deal as you will be taken care of by people FORCING others to do it. Jesus would frown on that. He was far more a Conservative than a socialist or Liberal (same thing, I know).

I know those two words together, Personal Responsibility confuse a lot of Liberals, but TRY and look up the meaning and learn them.

Scruffy wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Scruffy wrote: Well, it's clear to me that you do not want to look closely at whether your faith and your politics are in agreement. I've stated that I do not think they do and have provided quotes from the Bible which would show that Christianity and conservatism cannot be reconciled.

And no, you have not answered these questions:

Symbolic? It states very clearly, in black & white, what you should do. Where does it say that it is symbolic only? Look it up in the Bible, Viking, it's right there. Then tell me where in the Bible that I should interpret things as I see fit? Where does it say that I get to pick and choose the portions of the Bible to follow?

It's too bad that you get upset when someone questions your faith.

Not upset at all. And I know that 100% Christianity and Conservatism go hand in hand. Unlike Liberalism which teaches slothfulness, stealing, begging, forcefully taking from others and then giving THEIR money away and taking credit for it which is greed, lying and pride. Teaching that Personal Responsibility is not important is the Liberal way. Conservatives on the other hand teach that Personal Responsibility is a Christian and biblical way of life. All you are doing is baiting and repeating tired lines on here which we have morre than debunked. So I have many more important things to do than play your games on here. I know my faith and it will not be waivered and it is strong.

Show me where you debunked them. Quote yourself or someone else on this board that shows me where they have been debunked.

Thanks for not answering the questions, while at the same time misrepresenting the liberals.

Your welcome...... :thumbsup:

I posted a whole explanation on that passage. You can reread it slower if you need to.

Scruffy wrote: You can spin it however you want, but it is obviously and contraction of "Liberal" and "Retard." Putting the two together is not meant to be a compliment, but rather, it is a way to insult someone with whom you disagree.

Again, I doubt that the Christian religion thinks it is a positive action and I'll bet Jesus would never use that term.

How is libtard insulting? If the shoe fits, wear it.

Scruffy wrote:
Are you saying that liberals are Satan's minions? Because I know a lot of liberal Christians and it sure would be a shock for them to learn that they are part of Satan's army.

I would be slow to judge a fellow Christian with liberal tendencies.....however, James stated...

James 5:19-20

My brethren, if any among you strays from the truth and one turns him back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.