Q******* Marriages Passes State Senate

24 Mar 2011 22:26 #101 by Residenttroll returns

towermonkey wrote: Not because I say so. The law says so.


Law says the people of Colorado voted and said no to homosexual marriage.... interesting how you accept the notion it's legal for Democrats to trample on the Constitution ....all in the name of LOVE... :lol: :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:29 #102 by Local_Historian
Umm - check again - 16 is a legal age for consensual sex AND marriage in most states. And if the parents approve the marriage and give consent, how do you get to say its wrong?

http://www.usmarriagelaws.com/search/un ... ndex.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... th_America

Apparently you paid no attention to any history - an older husband has always been coveted, because he is better able to provide for a family.

Nice try at trying to make it "bad" - all you did was fail at making your point. What is your point?


Colorado votes and said no once - so now that several other states have said yes, they're wrong for bringing it up for vote again? You can always vote no again.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:30 #103 by Pony Soldier
The constitution does not single people out based on sexuality. The vote taken by the people of Colorado could be considered unconstitutional as it supports unequal treatment.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:31 #104 by Residenttroll returns

Local_Historian wrote: Umm - check again - 16 is a legal age for consensual sex AND marriage in most states. And if the parents approve the marriage and give consent, how do you get to say its wrong?

http://www.usmarriagelaws.com/search/un ... ndex.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... th_America

Apparently you paid no attention to any history - an older husband has always been coveted, because he is better able to provide for a family.

Nice try at trying to make it "bad" - all you did was fail at making your point. What is your point?


Colorado votes and said no once - so now that several other states have said yes, they're wrong for bringing it up for vote again? You can always vote no again.


Cool, maybe some pervert 43 year old man can find a couple of 16 year old sisters and marry them. Remember, they LOVE each other.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:32 #105 by Residenttroll returns

towermonkey wrote: The constitution does not single people out based on sexuality. The vote taken by the people of Colorado could be considered unconstitutional as it supports unequal treatment.


O.K. Let's apply that same logic to the collection of taxes too. MORONS

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:33 #106 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Q******* Marriages Passes State Senate
RT, is looking for a ride home.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:33 #107 by Pony Soldier
Oh you already know that I agree on the taxes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:35 #108 by Local_Historian
So, remember that when your kids decide to marry someone older - they must be perverts - both of them. You've oggled young women without knowing their ages - you a pervert too?

You're awfully hung p on this word - pervert. I'm starting to think you protest too much.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:36 - 24 Mar 2011 22:37 #109 by Residenttroll returns

CinnamonGirl wrote: RT, is looking for a ride home.



Sophomoric

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Mar 2011 22:36 #110 by Residenttroll returns

CinnamonGirl wrote: RT, is looking for a ride home.


Sophomoric

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.209 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+