Q******* Marriages Passes State Senate

residenttroll wrote: It has nothing to do with religion..... it has everything to do with perversion. What SOCIAL REDEEMING VALUE does homosexuality bring to America....or for that fact, the WORLD.....

Is there a clear definition of "Social Redeeming Value"?

Assuming we are talking about consenting adults, the main difference between a heterosexual relationship and a homosexual one is the ability to procreate, and with advances in medicine that too could change some day.

So does you definition of social redeeming value come down to the ability to procreate?

If so, how about heterosexual couples that choose not to have children? Or people who choose to stay single and not have children? Do they too lack social redeeming value?

And if it's not about the ability to have children, what is it? We can find many examples of homosexuals who have contributed much to society. I don't know what you've contributed, other than being a jerk on a message board. Do you have some "Social Redeeming Value"?

residenttroll wrote:

towermonkey wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Okay, men answer me this????

Why do alot of men like (or fantasize) about threesomes usually with women? You don't seem to take issue with that. Be honest. It is self serving.

RT wrote: Interesting .... if the three wanted to get married....you are o.k. with that? What if the two women were sisters or cousins? What's wrong with that? It's just love.

Sounds like a Penthouse Forum. What are you reading RT?

Just finished watching Two Men and Half followed by Will and Grace...and Three's Company.

Well, that explains everything. Your brain is now rotten.

YOU brought your family into this, you need to expect to be asked about them. And no, I won't shut up. You don't like the line of questioning of opinions YOU brought to light, then perhaps you shouldn't bring them to light.

Local_Historian wrote:

residenttroll wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Okay, men answer me this????

Why do alot of men like (or fantasize) about threesomes usually with women? You don't seem to take issue with that. Be honest. It is self serving.

Interesting .... if the three wanted to get married....you are o.k. with that? What if the two women were sisters or cousins? What's wrong with that? It's just love.

I don't care. Again, whoopie. So what. Good for them. And if the GIRLS are sisters or cousins, then exactly how is that a problem? It's not even a genetic issue. You're the one who claims no problem with people doing this in the privacy of their own homes - now it sounds different. Can't be on both sides of the fence - you either care what goes on behind closed doors or you don't.

Oh yea, he's 43 and the two sisters are 16. Yeah baby! It's just plain old simple love. No problems.

Hmm, underage twins. You had better stay away from those sites RT - the FBI can track you you know.

Local_Historian wrote: YOU brought your family into this, you need to expect to be asked about them. And no, I won't shut up. You don't like the line of questioning of opinions YOU brought to light, then perhaps you shouldn't bring them to light.

I never brought my family into this.... But in any case, I love my family unconditional. That should be sufficient.

So STFU and mind your business.

RT, STFU and mind your own business.


And WTH is the difference between a threesome and marriage. What is your distinction again? And you never answered my question about why you feel this way. What is the origin of your problem with being gay?

Believe it or not, I had to really think about gay marriage (not about being gay) there are fiscal implications. And thinking about the history of marriage. But you were not talking about gay marriage as much as you were bringing the words 'queer' and 'not normal' into it and I take huge issue with that.

towermonkey wrote: Hmm, underage twins. You had better stay away from those sites RT - the FBI can track you you know.

They're are only underage because you say they are underage..... maybe the 43 year old man will pay off some democrats and get the laws changed.

Their rights are being violated...they ALL really LOVE each other.

CinnamonGirl wrote:

So STFU and mind your business.

RT, STFU and mind your own business.


And WTH is the difference between a threesome and marriage. What is your distinction again? And you never answered my question about why you feel this way. What is the origin of your problem with being gay?

Believe it or not, I had to really think about gay marriage (not about being gay) there are fiscal implications. And thinking about the history of marriage. But you were not talking about gay marriage as much as you were bringing the words 'queer' and 'not normal' into it and I take huge issue with that.

Are you on you're second six pack yet? What the heck are you talking about?

Not because I say so. The law says so.