CinnamonGirl wrote: Trust me, you talk to anyone (start with JMC) I am not normal.
Don't need to speak with JMC...it's obvious.
CinnadumbGirl wrote: Gender, religion, race or ethnicity, and sexuality is just a natural freedom and right of the USA.
Who cares if CG does a little rewrite of the Constitution and adds sexuality. I am sure the polygamist would agree.
SinamoreGirl wrote: I am surprised that God has not been brought into this but if you feel this is from God. Why would he create a person that was not normal then condemn him/her for not being normal? That just does not make sense.
Use your brain. Why not bring God into the conversation? That's like putting cheese on the mouse trap when debating libtards. Libtards would begin the marginality of the debater and their positions. Who needs God or Jesus to understand that MARRIAGE is NOT between a man and woman. There is NO family when two men get married and NO family when two women get married. Heck, if I was a polygamist, I would think I am getting screwed by the homosexual agenda.
CinnabunsGirl wrote: And I can give you some reasons why same sex marriage may not be a good idea. But the subject of weather gay is normal is just a non subject anymore. It may not feel normal to us but it feels normal to someone. You cannot define normal for others.
It's about as normal and you sticking your finger in a electric socket. It might feel good at first...but eventually will burn you.
SendmeabrainGirl wrote: RT, I will give you this. You have been honest and talked about this and some others that usually make fun of gender, religion, race or ethnicity, and sexuality are suddenly silent. I have noticed the ones that make fun of others don't seem to want to really talk about it in depth. I admire those who stick to their guns and don't hide behind ridicule.
Admiration? Wow, I love been ridiculed for calling abnormal abnormal.
You have no problem if your kids were to marry a gay person, but gays are all perverts.
You have no problem if they wanted to marry someone older, even if they were just a teen, yet older guys marrying younger girls are perverts.
You present multiple marriage as an option, but those folks are all perverts.
You state you have no problem with what goes on behind closed doors, yet in almost the same breath, you declare those folks to be perverts.
Ever had sex in anything but the missionary position? Then according to the church, you too are a pervert.
No spin, baby - just putting your own words into a succinct, single post. Didn't change a word or meaning, just condensed it all.
Once again, who has the problem here? And denial issues as well? Ain't me.
Yeah, it's all about me.... imagine that, I call abnormal abnormal....queer queer....and all of sudden Local Historian wants to twist a debate from the constitutionality of civil union marriages...into an thread about me.
But 'not normal'? Really? Homosexuality, when viewed from a human sexuality context is abnormal. I don't mean that in an insulting manner, it's just a fact. It's becoming a more and more acceptable abnormality, but it still isn't normal.
Normal changes. The definition said that normal is a standard. Lots of things were not normal that are considered normal now.
I believe you might be confusing normal with natural. But even then, when you hear some homosexuals talk about what it like to try and be heterosexual it does not feel normal or natural, homosexuality did for them. So, WHY do you feel the need to make others conform to your subjective view of normal!! What is the point. Live and let live.
yes, YOUR morality - note the only one calling folks a pervert is you, while at the same time saying you don't care what they do in the privacy of their own homes. You should have added - as long as they don;t get the same rights as me - cause that's what you really meant.
sad your marriage and your views of marriage are so threatened by some guy getting to claim his partner on his insurance.
But 'not normal'? Really? Homosexuality, when viewed from a human sexuality context is abnormal. I don't mean that in an insulting manner, it's just a fact. It's becoming a more and more acceptable abnormality, but it still isn't normal.
Normal changes. The definition said that normal is a standard. Lots of things were not normal that are considered normal now.
I believe you might be confusing normal with natural. But even then, when you hear some homosexuals talk about what it like to try and be heterosexual it does not feel normal or natural, homosexuality did for them. So, WHY do you feel the need to make others conform to your subjective view of normal!! What is the point. Live and let live.
Normal is just too subjective.
Cool, let's go with natural.... is homosexual natural?
Yeah, let's go with natural.....
Tell CG, What's the primary natural purpose of your breasts?
Tell CG, what the primary natural purpose of the penis?
Tell CG, What's the primary natural purpose of the vagina?
Tell CG, what's the primary natural purpose of your anus?
