Elk Creek Fire demonstrating high level of competence

06 Apr 2012 19:25 #61 by jf1acai
The odor keeps getting stronger, and it is not burnt wood odor.

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Apr 2012 08:41 - 10 Dec 2016 22:25 #62 by jf1acai

CO-JEX-Lower North Fork Rx Escape:


Ab,


I am someone who is pretty familiar with wildland fire operations in Jefferson County, CO. I was not part of the wildland fire response to this incident. It seems that information relating the to escape and the entrapment of residents is slowly being made public. Maybe it's too early to have this kind of discussion, but it's fresh in my mind right now so I'm going to bring up a few issues.

First, I commend Chief McGlaughlin for speaking publicly about what happened that afternoon. He is fresh into his position in a new fire district, which has had more than its fair share of "leadership issues" over the past few years. He appears to be facing the challenges head on.

The area of the fire was under a Red Flag Warning last Monday; but as most firefighters know, not all RFWs are created equal. This was an extremely critical fire day, as identified by the National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center. Some folks in Jefferson County have been looking into the history of these kind of days: spring or fall dry seasons, extremely critical fuel moisture, and very strong southwest winds. These conditions have created almost all of the large fires along the Front Range within the past 20 or 30 years. These folks have presented their preliminary findings to various wildland fire groups in the county, and made some recommendations (NOT official guidelines or rules). Rapid fire suppression is the key... if these fires are not "caught" within the first hour two, the only option is to look towards evacuations and structure protection where possible. Most of the folks involved in the initial response should have understood the situation... however, I am wondering the extent to which Chief McGlaughlin was or was not aware of this research.

The Denver Post article makes it pretty clear that the CSFS burn boss, who became the initial IC when the escape was declared (following standard CSFS procedures) was too focused upon suppression. It's not too hard to imagine the "human factors" that would contribute to that. Was he thinking about the "bigger picture" and the LIKELIHOOD that this fire was headed for a blowup?? The fact that the initial sizeup report indicated the fire had "low spread potential" suggests that he either did not understand the situation or was too focused on "catching it" to consider that.

I believe that the fire technically started in North Fork's fire district, but it was very close to both the Elk Creek and Intercanyon districts. Was there confusion/disagreement about who would take control of the fire? Radio traffic suggests there were early discussions about "Type 3 overhead." Perhaps the first responders recognized the potential consequences of the escape, the complexity and the need for a type 3 IC and command structure... but that leadership was not in place in those early hours
The Denver Post article makes it pretty clear: the escape occurred at about 1240, but evacuations were not ordered until about 1700, when the blowup was already starting. Apparently this was the point where the Elk Creek and North Fork commanders pointedly took control. But there was a clear "window of opportunity" to order and begin evacuations, which was missed...and it seems pretty likely that three residents would still be alive if steps had been taken earlier. Chief McGlaughlin has said as much. I bring this up not to point blame, but to point out that there are critical lessons to be learned from this incident. Some things need fixin' locally, and I'm sure there are plenty of other agencies who conduct Rx fire, or have Rx fires in their districts conducted by other agencies, who need to take heed. Agencies who conduct Rx fire will not like to hear it... but in my opinion, there need to be clear protocols for when a fire district or other fire agency takes over an escaped Rx fire. On extreme fire days such as this one, these protocols need to be less focused on protecting the agency who lit the fire, and more focused on protecting citizens.


Source

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Apr 2012 14:01 - 10 Dec 2016 22:23 #63 by jf1acai
The CSFS burn plan is available here

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Apr 2012 15:31 - 10 Dec 2016 22:23 #64 by mtntrekker
Thanks jf1acai for the info.

Having spent some time in the area and to my way of thinking the controlled burn was in North Fork Fire district. When it went outside containment, it looks like it was still w/i NFF. When it jumped the drainage it looks like part was in Elk Creek Fire and to the east InterCanyon.

Have to agree with the above, there definitely was a failure in contacting residents soon enough and having the correct emergency alert notification info for all residents. And as I have said before, establishing IC and maintaining it or formally giving to another should have happened.

So very sad that three lives had to be lost and some did not receive the emergency alert notification. So many lessons to be learned from this experience.

I had the opportunity this morning to go up with one of the owners who lost their home and do some preliminary clean up and scope the area. I could clearly see the path the fire took as it rushed up the ridge. What really surprised me though was the amount of real estate that still could/can burn. So it is incumbent on all fire departments and jeffco sheriff to do their assessments and be prepared for the next one whatever ridge it turns out to be.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Apr 2012 21:41 #65 by jf1acai
Thanks for all your input, mtntrekker.

I'm just blown away by the apparent lack of interest shown by most of the posters here, and on PC, after just a few days, in an incident that took 3 civilian lives, 26+ homes, disrupted the lives of 1000+ of our neighbors, etc.

I realize that most of those directly affected are too busy now trying to get their lives back together again, and/or don't have access to internet forums to talk about it, but I still am surprised that so few seem to be interested in finding out what went wrong in this incident, and how to correct that so that it doesn't happen again.

A few immediately blamed it all on CSFS, without adequate information IMO.

As more information becomes available, it appears to me that CSFS has a significant part of the responsibility, but there is more than enough to go around.

I think we should all be interested in finding out what really led to this situation, and trying to work out reasonable ways to reduce the chances of it ever happening again.

I think we owe that to those who lost their lives, property, etc.

But, that is just me.

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Apr 2012 10:24 #66 by ScienceChic
I myself am waiting for the results of the official inquiries and to see what actions are implemented for the next incident to correct the problems experienced during this one, and what explanation/compensation is provided for the screw-ups in this one from the side that we've not heard from yet, until then I don't have enough information to say one way or another. It's not lack of interest, it's waiting to see what happens.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Apr 2012 10:39 - 10 Dec 2016 22:21 #67 by HappyCamper
I have not forgotten and have contacted officials in my area asking if it would be possible to do a test on the emergency alert notification system yearly.

I have not gotten a response back but if I do I will let you know.

I hope that those that were directly affected will share any information they have been given and like SC waiting for more of the official reports to come out.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Apr 2012 11:02 #68 by Beeks

I myself am waiting for the results of the official inquiries ........ and what explanation/compensation is provided for the screw-ups in this one


Seems like your mind is already made up......

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Apr 2012 17:17 #69 by CC
As I have said before.....I don't know what went wrong with this fire but something definitely did.
I will continue to publicly question the timelines and answers or lack of answers until the truth is on the table.
We owe that to the people who lost their lives and property.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Apr 2012 18:15 #70 by ScienceChic

Beeks wrote:

I myself am waiting for the results of the official inquiries ........ and what explanation/compensation is provided for the screw-ups in this one


Seems like your mind is already made up......

3 people died who were some of the first to call 911 - I'd say it's pretty obvious that there were screw-ups, based just on reading the transcripts and listening to the calls. That doesn't mean that my mind is made up, just that I acknowledge that there are definitely procedures at fault, and possibly people as well. There was an unacceptable number of people who were never alerted so the system definitely needs improvement. I understand that the people answering the phones don't have all the current information, but what they told those people should not have been said - there needs to training done for 911 operators at the very least to not dismiss smoke/fire concerns of mountain residents. I too was listening to the scanners after this fire started, and while I don't have the best experience to understand everything that was going on, it was pretty obvious that it was a mess. I don't know all the proper procedures so that's why I'm waiting for the official investigations to be finished and publicized.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.164 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+