- Posts: 15741
- Thank you received: 320
Final Results:Science Chic wrote: Okay, I figured I'd take a stab at figuring out the winners of the games this week, maybe save Renegade some time (or make him spend as much checking me). lol
Thursday, September 12
NY Jets +10 @ New England
Sunday, September 15
Cleveland +7 @ Baltimore
Carolina -2.5 @ Buffalo
Washington +7 @ Green Bay
Minnesota +5 @ Chicago
St. Louis +7 @ Atlanta - TIE
San Diego +7 @ Philly
Dallas +7 @ Kansas City
Tennessee +7 @ Houston
Miami +3 @ Indy
Detroit +7 @ Arizona
New Orleans -3.5 @ Tampa Bay
Denver -2 @ NY Giants
Jacksonville +5.5 @ Oakland - I'd gotten this winner wrong, it's actually OAK. Argyle was the only one to choose this game.
San Francisco + 2.5 @ Seattle
Monday, Sept 16
Pittsburgh +3 @ Cincy
Assuming I didn't mess up:
Blondie 5-0
Computer Breath 4-1
Printsmith 3-1-1
LOL 3-1-1
Science Chic 3-1-1
The Viking 3-x-1, 1 game left
pacamom 3-1-x, 1 game left
light switch 2-2-1
VL 2-2-x, 1 game left
Argyle 2-3 - Argyle had picked Oakland, so his score is changed
freebird x-3-1, 1 game left
Edited to add outcome of SF/Seattle game.
You actually finished 4-1 CB, Detroit beat the spread - the final score was ARI 25-DET 21 and the line was +7 for Detroit. Good picking!ComputerBreath wrote: Well...I'm 3 and 2 this week...Detroit lost as did Philly. Thank God for Seattle!
RenegadeCJ wrote: Week 3 Opening Spreads
Thursday, September 19
Kansas City +3 @ Philly
Sunday September 22
GB +1 @ Cincy
St. Louis +3.5 @ Dallas
Tampa Bay +7 @ New England
Cleveland +4 @ Minnesota
Houston +2.5 @ Baltimore
NY Giants +1.5 @ Carolina
Detroit +3 @ Washington
Arizona +9 @ New Orleans
San Diego +3 @ Tennessee
Atlanta PICKUM @ Miami
Jacksonville +17.5 @ Seattle
Buffalo +2 @ NY Jets
Indy +9 @ San Francisco
Chicago +3 @ Pittsburgh
Monday September 23
Oakland +13 @ Denver
LOL wrote: Have to pick early this week.
NO COPYING MY PICKS BIG DOOKIE!
:woo hoo:
LOL week 3
Chicago
Atlanta
Detroit
NY Giants
Dallas
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Science Chic wrote: Getting back to the proposed change of being able to pick one team more than once, so far we have 2 votes for, 2 votes against, 1 no position, and several non-votes. Any more thoughts on this?
I would say that if we do it, it is absolutely still based on the opening spread, all you are doing is putting your eggs in one basket using the same team. So if GB is projected to win by 5, and wins by 7, and you chose them for 3 of your 5 picks, plus two other games, then your score is 3-x-x.
We need a majority vote if we're going to change this, otherwise it will stay the same. There are 11 of us playing so that's 5 Yes votes that are needed. Let's put a deadline of Wednesday on this so we know going into this week's picks or not. Keep in mind that we already have two players that have selected for this week, and they are unable to change their picks so they would be at a disadvantage should we choose to make this change.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Science Chic wrote: Getting back to the proposed change of being able to pick one team more than once, so far we have 2 votes for, 2 votes against, 1 no position, and several non-votes. Any more thoughts on this?
I would say that if we do it, it is absolutely still based on the opening spread, all you are doing is putting your eggs in one basket using the same team. So if GB is projected to win by 5, and wins by 7, and you chose them for 3 of your 5 picks, plus two other games, then your score is 3-x-x.
We need a majority vote if we're going to change this, otherwise it will stay the same. There are 11 of us playing so that's 5 Yes votes that are needed. Let's put a deadline of Wednesday on this so we know going into this week's picks or not. Keep in mind that we already have two players that have selected for this week, and they are unable to change their picks so they would be at a disadvantage should we choose to make this change.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
thanks for catching that. didn't notice it myself.Science Chic wrote: Jacksonville +5.5 @ Oakland - I'd gotten this winner wrong, it's actually OAK. Argyle was the only one to choose this game.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Big Dougy wrote: Do we have to always cater to the lowest common denominators around here? Paca, invest the 2 minutes it takes to figure this out, its not that complicated. You can make one team more than one of your picks-
Its just that simple
#
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.