New PP Report Record Abortions Done 2009

kresspin wrote: They sure do want to tell me what I can do with it.

We already know what you did with it. That is how you got pregnant. But after you did that with it, society has an interest in another human life.

kresspin wrote: It's not a baby until it's viable on its own. I do oppose late-term abortions. I don't oppose removing a bunch of cells.

And your not a liberal. Riiight.

wow...simply amazing...how can a baby live on its own when its born, can't feed itself, can't protect itself, dependant on the mother for feeding and taking care of it..kapow..just shot your theory down! Those cells have a heart that beats, a brain that is forming, and you say it's not a baby?? I wonder if you have children? I have to admit your pretty cold hearted...a bunch of cells..

Yes, I suppose calling a "thing" that has a body with arms, legs, a beating heart, and is sucking it's thumb a "bunch of cells" is much easier to suction out of a woman's body than if we were to call it a baby. Got it.

seems to me, this is her way of justifying the murder of a child in the womb..just a bunch of cells, seems to me we are just a bunch of cells, but I wonder how kresspin would feel if someone decided she was a pain to live with and took her life, because the person didn't like her bunch of cells...

CriticalBill wrote: Yes, I suppose calling a "thing" that has a body with arms, legs, a beating heart, and is sucking it's thumb a "bunch of cells" is much easier to suction out of a woman's body than if we were to call it a baby. Got it.

What you describe is a fully-developed fetus. What I described was not.

Its still a person kresspin, no matter what you say! Its a baby in the womb..

so, what's the difference of a baby that gets nourishment from within the womb as opposed outside the womb, both are dependant on the mother for survival?

No, you are wrong...they can start sucking their thumbs as early as 15 weeks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thumb_sucking

I've seen it myself in early ultrasounds.

outdoor338 wrote: so, what's the difference of a baby that gets nourishment from within the womb as opposed outside the womb, both are dependant on the mother for survival?

It's just a waste of time trying to explain it to her outdoor....since an "all knowing judge" says so.

Major Bean wrote: It's not a baby until it's viable on its own. I do oppose late-term abortions. I don't oppose removing a bunch of cells.

And your not a liberal. Riiight.[/quote]

Oh, you mean ALL conservatives oppose pro-choice?

Just wondering. How many babies have you carried inside your body?