Muslim Obama Throws Israel Under The Bus

But, but...He's a socialist. How can he be a socialist and Adolph Hitler at the same time? Enquiring minds want to know.

I think we have been through this argument many times before Loose Jerk, it was called the National Socialist Democratic Party, if I'm not mistaken.

Tsk, Tsk...as usual, insults but no answers. That's okay we'll wait while you read your sources to find out what to be outraged about next.

The Dude wrote: Didn't both Clinton and Bush suggest that they go back to the 1967 borders as well? Does that make them muslim or anti semites?

1. Yes they did and 2. by way of the logic of the OP it should. My guess is that he will not answer this question. :pop

Nmysys wrote:

But, but...He's a socialist. How can he be a socialist and Adolph Hitler at the same time? Enquiring minds want to know.

I think we have been through this argument many times before Loose Jerk, it was called the National Socialist Democratic Party, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes we have, NmNuts. It's too bad you can't remember from one slapdown to the next what the history was behind the choosing of the word Socialist at the time and what it meant.

But when I have access to my desktop again I'll cram it down your throat like I always do.

neptunechimney wrote: Really? Well that proves it. You are a anti-Semitic bullshi*t liar.

Don't hold back - tell me how you really feel. I tend to post these drastic comparisons when somebody portrays Israel as being the poor victim.

Nmysys wrote: TowerMonkey:

You aren't that naive to believe that all the Palestinians have thrown at Israel is just rocks.

Of course not.

outdoor338 wrote: Hey TM, here are some of your pals throwing rocks in the 67 war..

Good example. How long did that war last? And how many in that video were Palestinians?

Nothing New in the Idea That '67 Borders Should Guide Peace Talks (UPDATED)

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/05/nothing-new-in-the-idea-that-67-borders-should-guide-peace-talks-updated/239162/

:pop

Nmysys wrote:

But, but...He's a socialist. How can he be a socialist and Adolph Hitler at the same time? Enquiring minds want to know.

I think we have been through this argument many times before Loose Jerk, it was called the National Socialist Democratic Party, if I'm not mistaken.

hmmmmmm.....using your logic, all the Democrats have to do is change their name to The Conservative Democratic Party and you would vote for them because the word "conservative" is in their name? Or, would you be as smart as LJ and know that just because a term like conservative or socialist is used in a title, it doesn't mean that is what they are. Nazis were about as far from socialism as the tea party.....come to think of it, they are actually quite similar, so I guess it is now the Socialist Tea Party?

I believe you know how untenable your argument is and that's why all the name calling.

A rose by any other name is still a rose, except using Liberal logic.

Archer:

Go take your Geritol.