.King of the zero response threads

Nobody that matters wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

I was shocked by your arogance

I get it... you were struck by the fact that someone could come even remotely close to the level of egotism and arrogance you normally display. It's understandable - you've stood alone in that department for a considerable length of time.

Oh don't try to sound smart now NTM.

jf1acai wrote: You 'forgot' to mention the Democratic Party's contributions to to same old BS.

..I haven't seen anything close to the lunacy of the Tea Party or the "birthers" coming in from the Left.

You haven't been looking, they all have very narrow vision, and are only concerned with personal gain, rather than the good of the country, IMO.

jf1acai wrote: You haven't been looking, they all have very narrow vision, and are only concerned with personal gain, rather than the good of the country, IMO.

Hey jf1acai I take exception to that. Viking keeps telling me that I am more conservative than I think I am though. When do I get to meet you?

HEARTLESS wrote: Recently I learned that Scruffy is archer. The Scruffy avatar showed an older man with a mustache. Should women be treated by a different standard than men? Should we have to show proof of sex, sexual preference and so on, or be treated as our posts direct?

WHAT? I am so confused.

neptunechimney wrote:

HEARTLESS wrote: Recently I learned that Scruffy is archer. The Scruffy avatar showed an older man with a mustache. Should women be treated by a different standard than men? Should we have to show proof of sex, sexual preference and so on, or be treated as our posts direct?

WHAT? I am so confused.

No more so than I am

Vice Lord wrote: Oh don't try to sound smart now NTM.

Sorry, didn't mean to talk over yer head.

major bean wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

Nobody that matters wrote:

chickaree wrote: I find it sad that so many prefer ad hominem attacks to fruitful discussion. I also find it significant that those most viciously attacked are women.

Here's something you might find interesting.

I don't keep track of who's male or female, because I really don't care. Some are obvious due to usernames, but if the username doesn't explicitly tell me, I assume nothing. I have no idea if you are a man or a woman, I have no idea what your skin color is. To me you are a collection of words on a screen - a thought. If I disagree with that thought, I'll post up and disagree. If you attack, I'll respond in kind.

I think some women might be put off by the responses they get on the internet. In face to face interactions, I treat women differently than men. I was rasied to be a gentleman, and if a woman is rude to me, I just put her in the 'bitch' category, keep my mouth shut and go on with life. But on the internet, if a woman is rude, and I'm not concerned with the sex of the author, they'll get what's coming.

Wow, 2 paragraphs and about 20 "I"s, 10 "i'll"s and a few "I'm"s....I [/b] just can't i [/b]magi [/b]ne anyone cari [/b]ng that much about what you thi [/b]nk NTM...And furthermore just because I'm [/b] civil to someone i [/b]n person doesn't mean I [/b] don't thi [/b]nk they are an i [/b]di [/b]ot- I [/b]t just means i [/b] don't want to go nose to nose with someone. Nowadays you can get arrested for yelling at people...I [/b] know

Wow! 14 uses of "I". Why has your real estate agent not copyrighted "I" for you?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!! rofllol rofllol :faint:

Nobody that matters wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: "Too many 'I's"??? Must be another slow news day...

"And what's that BLACK man doing in my WHITE House?" You guys need some better material...

Wait, whut? There's a BLACK man in my WHITE house?!?!?!?!

I'm outraged!!!!!!!!!!

Wait, my house is white? Who in hell came and painted my nice house such an obnoxious color?

No secret that I don't see eye-to-eye with Nymisis.

However - I'm not going to indulge in mocking/humiliating him.

Sorry, VL --- just not my cup of tea.