Taking Cain Seriously

Why should the Republican candidates bother you Democratic liberals? You will approve of noone except a Democrat. Your posts are a waste of pixels concerning Republicans.

Uh, because the Republican candidate might become our president? Just a wild guess.

RenegadeCJ wrote: How about a Cain/Rubio ticket? That would likely lead to 16 yrs of rep leadership!

It's gonna be Cain, Newt.

Conservation Voice wrote: Uh, because the Republican candidate might become our president? Just a wild guess.

In fact it is likely.

posteryoyo wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote: How about a Cain/Rubio ticket? That would likely lead to 16 yrs of rep leadership!

It's gonna be Cain, Newt.

Newt has been critical of the 9-9-9 plan.

Then again, George H. Bush called Reagan's plan "Voodoo economics".

pineinthegrass wrote:

posteryoyo wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote: How about a Cain/Rubio ticket? That would likely lead to 16 yrs of rep leadership!

It's gonna be Cain, Newt.

Newt has been critical of the 9-9-9 plan.

Then again, George H. Bush called Reagan's plan "Voodoo economics".

and he was right.

And 9-9-9 is not only "Voodoo economics", it's "SimCity economics."

The BIG DIFFERENCE Between Right & Left!

Did the Tea Party "occupy" anything for more than a day? I"m not getting the connection.

And wasn't the Tea Party adamant that it was nothing like OWS? So why compare them?

Can you imagine a presidential address to the nation that goes like this?

[youtube:13ndgcln][/youtube:13ndgcln]