Arlen wrote: The person who is "down on their luck" (as you say) is the exception, not the rule. But liberals always try to make the exeption the rule. That is how they get away with so many abusive programs.
I assume that you can provide a link, or other facts, that back up your assertion?
Don't play games. "Compassionate Liberal" - what an oxymoron. There is no compassion in a policy that gives away our public monies to the unmotivated and lazy.
Arlen wrote: Don't play games. "Compassionate Liberal" - what an oxymoron. There is no compassion in a policy that gives away our public monies to the unmotivated and lazy.
For which you have no data or facts as backup to your unsubstantiated opinion.
Arlen wrote: I am too busy reading all of the substantiated facts and data that you have provided.
Really? Such as?
You have asserted that the majority of people on public assistance are scamming the system and are "unmotivated and lazy," to which you have provided no proof. You're not even going to try to back up your statements?
Arlen wrote: I am too busy reading all of the substantiated facts and data that you have provided.
Really? Such as?
You have asserted that the majority of people on public assistance are scamming the system and are "unmotivated and lazy," to which you have provided no proof. You're not even going to try to back up your statements?
I stated my opinion, just as you stated your opinion. Suddenly, you get bossy and demand things. Typical liberal reaction.
I'm asking you to back up, with facts, an unsubstantiated assertion that you made. I'm not demanding it. I understand that you can't provide those facts, so you are ignoring the request and attacking me. Typical conservative reaction.
