LadyJazzer wrote: Then I guess we'd better not start a food stamp program for bears... But as irrelevant analogies go, that's cute...
Not irrelevant, just too complex for you to understand.
By offering them free food that is easier to get than actually working for it, you discourage them from working for it.
Maybe you have never seen it, but I have. Able bodied people reduced to minimalist exsistences going out only for food at the beginning of the month and spending the rest of their days watching TV. And liberals are deluded enough to call this compassion.
"Hey, we fed them and made them obese, what else do you want us to do?"
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
And all conservatives are ignorant enough to call that the "rule" rather than the exception...and never offer anything but their opinions, and their dogma, and a few isolated anecdotes.
Hey, I have an idea... Why don't we all go out to YouTube and do a search on "pedophile priests"...and "Catholic priests with children"... That might give us a yardstick by which to measure ALL Catholic priests... Ya think?
Oh, well..."speak of the devil"....
Catholic bishop resigns, admits he has 2 kids Archdiocese of Los Angeles assistant bishop had a secret family in another state
LadyJazzer wrote: And all conservatives are ignorant enough to call that the "rule" rather than the exception...and never offer anything but their opinions, and their dogma, and a few isolated anecdotes.
You are using absolutes too, eh?
Notice that Republicans when Newt was in office didn't end welfare, they just limited it to 3 years. Enough to help people who needed temporary help, but not enough for them to become dependant.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Not irrelevant, just too complex for you to understand.
