Obamacare Violates The Separation Of Church & State?

Yeah but sometimes the result of a preganancy results in a $h*t being born. As seen somewhere here.

Is there a reason you won't respond to reasoned responses to your posts archer? The pattern seems to be that you will only respond to posts which get a rise out of you to avail yourself of the opportunity to engage in petty back and forth. I can certainly alter my responses so as to include an opportunity for you to respond to mine in such a fashion if that is what it takes, but I'd really rather have a discussion on the merits of what each of us are posting if it's all the same to you.

PrintSmith wrote: Heads up Twin - you are about to be informed that pregnancy is a medical condition that can be prevented through the use of contraception. Human life in the womb is nothing more, or less, than a medical condition for the purposes of advancing a culture of death ideology.

I didn't consider this a reasoned response that was worth my responding to.

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Heads up Twin - you are about to be informed that pregnancy is a medical condition that can be prevented through the use of contraception. Human life in the womb is nothing more, or less, than a medical condition for the purposes of advancing a culture of death ideology.

Really? No... getting pregnant is a normal bodily function. Just like sh*tting is a normal bodily function caused by eating, pregnancy is simply the normal outcome that sometimes happens when you put something else in you.

Only those who have never been pregnant would liken it to "taking a sh*t". Yes it is normal, but it is also considered a medical condition......for which women pay big bucks to specialists in obstetrics to keep them and their baby healthy during it, and to make the delivery as safe as possible. Do you do that when you take a sh*t? Well.....maybe you do GOP, anyone who whines as much as you do probably calls the doctor when it's time to sh*t.

I'm not sure what that has to do with free contraceptives? No one has a RIGHT to sex. Luckily there are free or low cost contraception available, but there is no way every insurance company should be mandated by the federal government to supply it, at some cost to someone. And there is absolutely no way that an organization that has a religious reason against contraception should be mandated to supply health insurance that guarantees reproductive services NOR offer access to health insurance that promises FREE reproductive services.

YOu want folks like Santorum to be kept out of the White House because of his religious beliefs, well, you keep the White House out of my religious organization. Deal?

Deal...that's easy...no one has ever told a conservative she HAS to use birth control.

archer wrote: Deal...that's easy...no one has ever told a conservative she HAS to use birth control.

And who ever told you you had to use contraception?

archer wrote: Deal...that's easy...no one has ever told a conservative she HAS to use birth control.

Same as you do with PrintSmith, you ignore a whole paragraph of a point I made and spar with the easy dig. You can't deal with the real issues.

And what point would that be that hasn't already been addressed previously in this thread? You keep stating the same opinion over and over and over again...that doesnt mean that others have to respond more than once.

Post whatever you want....but you don't get to dictate what I choose to respond to.

No one has a right to sex? It's long past time for anyone to take you seriously anymore.

Soulshiner wrote: No one has a right to sex? It's long past time for anyone to take you seriously anymore.

You do have a right to sex? Does that means you can rape someone if you want sex? NO... I don't think you have a right to sex.