- Posts: 15341
- Thank you received: 163
Was it unanimus? And if there was an opposite outcome due to justices that believe abortion should only be performed in limited cases, would you be saying "the justices have spoken, and therefore the ruling is correct" ?Kate wrote:
No, I mean Supreme Court Justices, with legal background and knowledge exceeding your experience.CritiKalbILL wrote:
You mean just a few individuals with political bias.Kate wrote: And yet the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
They once disagreed with those that said slaves were human beings endowed with rights as well. That they disagree with me doesn't mean that they are correct this time any more than the other ones were correct when they disagreed with what was being said regarding the humanity of those who were enslaved and entirely subject to the whim of their master.Kate wrote: And yet the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Don't confuse kate with facts..it's not nice.PrintSmith wrote:
They once disagreed with those that said slaves were human beings endowed with rights as well. That they disagree with me doesn't mean that they are correct this time any more than the other ones were correct when they disagreed with what was being said regarding the humanity of those who were enslaved and entirely subject to the whim of their master.Kate wrote: And yet the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
If you don't like slavery, don't own slavesLadyJazzer wrote: Let us know when they change their minds...UNTIL THEN....
If you don't like abortion, don't have one...
If it's not your fetus, it's none of your business...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
When the Supreme Court changes the Roe v. Wade ruling, let me know. Until then, it's the law of the land and your opinion on the matter is just an opinion.PrintSmith wrote:
They once disagreed with those that said slaves were human beings endowed with rights as well. That they disagree with me doesn't mean that they are correct this time any more than the other ones were correct when they disagreed with what was being said regarding the humanity of those who were enslaved and entirely subject to the whim of their master.Kate wrote: And yet the Supreme Court disagrees with you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
PrintSmith wrote: And that's what I'm setting out to do - change the opinion of the Supreme Court and have them one day protect the endowment of unalienable rights promised to all in our founding documents instead of selectively ignoring them on a piecemeal basis because some prefer the way things are purely for economic reasons.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.