Planned Parenthood Target Of New Undercover Sting?

So, to get back on the original topic, why is it objectionable to try and ascertain that human life isn't being destroyed for no other reason that it is female? That would be misogyny, right? Destroying a human life simply because it is female would be objectionable, wouldn't it? Or are you OK with abortionists targeting only female human life for destruction LJ because it's no one else's business if misogyny is taking place at the abortion clinics in this union?

:Snooze

I'm also not OK with you making and/or watching kiddie-porn; molesting the children of your neighbors, or selling drugs to high-school students. Would you be OK if I send in a team to try to ascertain whether you were doing those things? Or to entrap you into making some statements that could be stitched together and creatively-edited to suggest you were doing those things?

See: "The Right-to-Life/Anti-Abortion thread.." in the Ring...

No - the thread is about someone probing the operations at PP to see if they are advocating/supporting abortions targeting human life that is female because it is female. Has nothing at all to do with whether abortion should be or should not be allowed at all - I am asking why it is objectionable to look into whether or not abortions are being done for misogynistic reasons and whether or not PP is an enabler of such a policy. That is, after all, what the probe was looking to determine, isn't it?

I've answered your question.

:Snooze

See: "The Right-to-Life/Anti-Abortion thread.." in the Ring...

PrintSmith wrote: No - the thread is about someone probing the operations at PP to see if they are advocating/supporting abortions targeting human life that is female because it is female. Has nothing at all to do with whether abortion should be or should not be allowed at all - I am asking why it is objectionable to look into whether or not abortions are being done for misogynistic reasons and whether or not PP is an enabler of such a policy. That is, after all, what the probe was looking to determine, isn't it?

You should give up trying to get an answer from her... she'll just cause you brain damage.

That won't stop me from exposing that the thread has been about abortion since it was started CB, despite the empty protestations to the contrary. She doesn't want to address the topic - which was that PP believes someone is engaged in an effort to determine whether or not they are assisting/advocating misogyny.

From the article linked to in the post which started the thread:

According to Planned Parenthood spokesperson Chloe Cooney, clinics in at least 11 states have reported two dozen or more "hoax visits" over the past several weeks, in which a woman walks into a clinic, claims to be pregnant and asks a particular pattern of provocative questions about sex-selective abortions, such as how soon she can find out the gender of the fetus, by what means and whether she can schedule an abortion if she's having a girl.

Of course LJ doesn't want to discuss this even though she is the one who started the thread on this subject - misogyny is none of anyone's business and our laws allow for a woman to destroy human life simply because it is female and that reality isn't something she wants to talk about.

:Snooze

I'm also not OK with you making and/or watching kiddie-porn; molesting the children of your neighbors, or selling drugs to high-school students. Would you be OK if I send in a team to try to ascertain whether you were doing those things? Or to entrap you into making some statements that could be stitched together and creatively-edited to suggest you were doing those things?

If you have a link to prove misogyny, post it. Otherwise, you're on one of your b.s. fishing expeditions.

See: "The Right-to-Life/Anti-Abortion thread.." in the Ring...

LadyJazzer wrote: :Snooze

I'm also not OK with you making and/or watching kiddie-porn; molesting the children of your neighbors, or selling drugs to high-school students. Would you be OK if I send in a team to try to ascertain whether you were doing those things? Or to entrap you into making some statements that could be stitched together and creatively-edited to suggest you were doing those things?

If you have a link to prove misogyny, post it. Otherwise, you're on one of your b.s. fishing expeditions.

See: "The Right-to-Life/Anti-Abortion thread.." in the Ring...

If my business opened up those options as a possibility, as PP's participation in the abortion business does, would it be out of line for someone to check into whether or not I was actively participating in such activities? Why would I find it objectionable if someone was looking into that possibility if indeed I wasn't engaged in such atrocity? Who would have thought that a respected retired Sheriff who had a jail named in his honor was actually trading meth for homosexual sex with young boys and potentially telling two high school aged boys whom he caught having sex in the locker room that if they allowed him to join in he wouldn't report them? That would be equally unbelievable as PP engaging in misogynistic practices, wouldn't it?

PrintSmith wrote: If my business opened up those options as a possibility, as PP's participation in the abortion business does, would it be out of line for someone to check into whether or not I was actively participating in such activities? Why would I find it objectionable if someone was looking into that possibility if indeed I wasn't engaged in such atrocity? Who would have thought that a respected retired Sheriff who had a jail named in his honor was actually trading meth for homosexual sex with young boys and potentially telling two high school aged boys whom he caught having sex in the locker room that if they allowed him to join in he wouldn't report them? That would be equally unbelievable as PP engaging in misogynistic practices, wouldn't it?

Really? You're comparing the investigation of one sheriff to the concerted effort of an entire political party to bring down an organization simply because that party dislikes one of the services they provide, even though it is legal? The conservatives are on a witch hunt here, and they don't care who gets hurt in the process.......the GOP war on women continues unabated.

archer wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: If my business opened up those options as a possibility, as PP's participation in the abortion business does, would it be out of line for someone to check into whether or not I was actively participating in such activities? Why would I find it objectionable if someone was looking into that possibility if indeed I wasn't engaged in such atrocity? Who would have thought that a respected retired Sheriff who had a jail named in his honor was actually trading meth for homosexual sex with young boys and potentially telling two high school aged boys whom he caught having sex in the locker room that if they allowed him to join in he wouldn't report them? That would be equally unbelievable as PP engaging in misogynistic practices, wouldn't it?

Really? You're comparing the investigation of one sheriff to the concerted effort of an entire political party to bring down an organization simply because that party dislikes one of the services they provide, even though it is legal? The conservatives are on a witch hunt here, and they don't care who gets hurt in the process.......the GOP war on women continues unabated.

An entire political party? More hyperbole?
I haven't seen Mitt Romney supporting the eradication of Planned Parenthood. Their is a law that says abortion can not be paid for with federal funds. I think some Republicans want to make sure this law isn't broken.