Planned Parenthood Target Of New Undercover Sting?

24 Apr 2012 21:12 #51 by LadyJazzer
If you don't like abortion, don't have one.

If it's not your fetus, it's none of your business...

The Supreme Court says it's legal, and it should be between a woman and her doctor... Don't like it? Tough.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 08:48 #52 by bailey bud

If you don't like abortion, don't have one.

Check

If it's not your fetus, it's none of your business...


If it's not a baby --- you're not pregnant.

The Supreme Court says it's legal, and it should be between a woman and her doctor...


Let me point out that the notion of privacy was never explicitly addressed by the Constitution. Privacy is a matter that has been created through judicial interpretation. (although I appreciate my privacy just as much as the next person).

HOWEVER, the principle of free speech was ---- I think there are perfectly legal grounds for asserting the right to articulate one's views (including scientifically objective information) on this admittedly complex problem.

No - I'm not going to waste my time and money trying to make it illegal.

However, I do and will support efforts that expose the grotesque practice of abortion for what it is. I support efforts to expose the cynical ethics of people who practice abortion. Finally, I do and will support efforts to provide care, grace, and humanity to the individuals (specifically women) that get caught up in unplanned pregnancies, regardless of the final outcome.

We're talking about life - and life is precious.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 09:06 #53 by Rick

bailey bud wrote:

If you don't like abortion, don't have one.

Check

If it's not your fetus, it's none of your business...


If it's not a baby --- you're not pregnant.

The Supreme Court says it's legal, and it should be between a woman and her doctor...


Let me point out that the notion of privacy was never explicitly addressed by the Constitution. Privacy is a matter that has been created through judicial interpretation. (although I appreciate my privacy just as much as the next person).

HOWEVER, the principle of free speech was ---- I think there are perfectly legal grounds for asserting the right to articulate one's views (including scientifically objective information) on this admittedly complex problem.

No - I'm not going to waste my time and money trying to make it illegal.

However, I do and will support efforts that expose the grotesque practice of abortion for what it is. I support efforts to expose the cynical ethics of people who practice abortion. Finally, I do and will support efforts to provide care, grace, and humanity to the individuals (specifically women) that get caught up in unplanned pregnancies, regardless of the final outcome.

We're talking about life - and life is precious.

:like:

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 11:02 #54 by PrintSmith
Circa 1860:
If you don't like slavery, don't have slaves
If it isn't your slave, it's none of your business
The Supreme Court and the Constitution say slavery is legal . . . Don't like it? Tough.

Circa 1960:
If you don't like racial discrimination, don't discriminate based on race.
If it isn't your school, it's none of your business
The Supreme Court says Separate But Equal is legal . . . Don't like it? Tough.

Circa 2000:
If you don't like abortion, don't have one.
If it's not your fetus, it's none of your business...
The Supreme Court says it's legal . . . Don't like it? Tough.

Think of all the progress that would have been lost if the union had listened to Democrats spout such drivel and blindly complied . . . . .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 11:30 #55 by LadyJazzer
So, why don't you go start a thread on abortion, and you put all your garbage in one place?

This thread is STILL about the fact that O'Keefe and his knuckle-dragging goons are still trying to play the entrapment-game with PP--and getting caught at it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 12:13 #56 by PrintSmith
Which, of course, says nothing about whether or not PP is an active participant in the misogynistic practice of helping some women obtain an abortion on the basis of the sex of the child that is in the womb. That they are intelligent enough to sniff out a clumsy probe doesn't by default mean that they do not willingly participate in the practice. Perhaps the reason they caught on so quick is that they are specifically looking to make sure their participation doesn't become common knowledge? Food for thought at least.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 12:18 #57 by Kate
Ah, yes, speculation. It's wonderful. You get to sort of accuse someone of something terrible, and then backpedal to say, "I'm just asking questions. What are they afraid of?"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 12:21 #58 by PrintSmith
Once you are willing to support your business destroying human life, how much further down the slope is it to destroy that human life simply because it's the wrong sex to support the business?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 12:22 #59 by Kate
In your opinion. Which is also an opinion that the Supreme Court does not share.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Apr 2012 12:29 #60 by PrintSmith
The Supreme Court supports misogyny? Got a link for that?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.150 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+