- Posts: 89
- Thank you received: 0
I have to agree, Tammy was a bit much. I'll vote for David.shilohloki wrote: Okay, I admit I had paid NO attention to the coroner's race, wrapped up as I was with the SO stuff, so the Bailey debate I went to was the first time I'd heard anything about either one of them. That being said, I was very unimpressed with Tammy, so I'm wondering why you all are going to vote for her, perhaps you can share some stuff that will change my mind.
At the debate, Tammy was abrasive and snotty when she was addressing the audience - I was taken aback actually by how severe she was. All I could imagine was her trying to make a death notification with that attitude! David on the other hand, was mild-mannered and what he said made sense to me.
Tammy's views on cutting costs by doing her own forensics work disturbed me too, my education being in that field, she seemed not to grasp the value of having such delicate and often questioned-in-court work done in a real lab setting by experts. This immediately sent up red flags for me.
Thoughts?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
shilohloki wrote: Tammy was abrasive and snotty when she was addressing the audience - I was taken aback actually by how severe she was.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I do not believe that Tammy Davis said that she would do her own forensic investigations laboratory work. Considering her past experience, I would assume that she knows when to send evidence to a lab for DNA analysis, chemical analysis, etc. This is a very important point.shilohloki wrote: Okay, I admit I had paid NO attention to the coroner's race, wrapped up as I was with the SO stuff, so the Bailey debate I went to was the first time I'd heard anything about either one of them. That being said, I was very unimpressed with Tammy, so I'm wondering why you all are going to vote for her, perhaps you can share some stuff that will change my mind.
At the debate, Tammy was abrasive and snotty when she was addressing the audience - I was taken aback actually by how severe she was. All I could imagine was her trying to make a death notification with that attitude! David on the other hand, was mild-mannered and what he said made sense to me.
Tammy's views on cutting costs by doing her own forensics work disturbed me too, my education being in that field, she seemed not to grasp the value of having such delicate and often questioned-in-court work done in a real lab setting by experts. This immediately sent up red flags for me.
Thoughts?
I have re-read her other postings in this thread and have not found where she has stated that all forensic investivation will be "in house". I shall go and re-read again and make sure that I have not missed something.Tammy Davis wrote: I will investigate each case to the fullest and present a complete and accurate case to the forensic pathologist. This will enable us to work together to determine the cause of death.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Then I misunderstood your post.shilohloki wrote: Sorry, no, I was referring to her collecting her own prints and toxicology.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
shilohloki wrote: ...At the debate, Tammy was abrasive and snotty when she was addressing the audience - I was taken aback actually by how severe she was. All I could imagine was her trying to make a death notification with that attitude!...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.