How To Improve The Presidential Debates?

02 Oct 2012 21:48 #21 by Photo-fish
Cage match debate?

Seriously, they are too hyped and may as well be scripted from their commercials. They already know the topics and can preassemble canned answers. They don't need an audience. It can be done in an empty TV studio. Face to face with a moderator. Everyone in underwear to level the playing field.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Oct 2012 21:49 #22 by LadyJazzer
And Mittens has already said, "We don' need no steenkin' facts, truth or math...We need ZINGERS!".... Oh, and the ubiquitous "heh-heh-heh" at the end.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Oct 2012 22:16 #23 by Soulshiner
Man, traffic is gonna be a shit show down here tomorrow. Gonna stay home after 3. The helicopters are already flying.

When you plant ice you're going to harvest wind. - Robert Hunter

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Oct 2012 22:18 #24 by Mary Scott

Democracy4Sale wrote: And Mittens has already said, "We don' need no steenkin' facts, truth or math...We need ZINGERS!".... Oh, and the ubiquitous "heh-heh-heh" at the end.

Perhaps a spelling error while quoting Mittens?

Your search - "We don' need no steenkin' facts, truth or math...We need ZINGERS!" - did not match any documents.

Suggestions:
Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
Try different keywords.
Try more general keywords.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Oct 2012 22:27 #25 by Photo-fish
Mmmm! Zingers....


´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Oct 2012 23:13 #26 by FredHayek
John Kerry is Obama's debate sparring partner. Pretty good choice.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Oct 2012 06:54 #27 by Photo-fish

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Oct 2012 08:29 #28 by TPP

FredHayek wrote:

TPP wrote: Put a 7 second delay on first, then add eletrodes to each side of their gentails, and each time they LIE, they get about 9 volts, (not enough to kill them), but enough so the FOLKS at home will know when they Lie. It will add time to the "debate", but it would be MUCH better TV watching enjoyment.


Of course, sometimes they believe their own lies...


That's why we would need the 7 second delay, so the Fact Checkers could push the button, then again we may not hear a thing since the Fact Checkers may just hold down the button.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Oct 2012 08:32 #29 by TPP

Photo-squirrel wrote: Cage match debate?

Seriously, they are too hyped and may as well be scripted from their commercials. They already know the topics and can preassemble canned answers. They don't need an audience. It can be done in an empty TV studio. Face to face with a moderator. Everyone in underwear to level the playing field.



With all the fags oblama smokes, he couldn't last, if Mitt ran around the cage, easy win.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Oct 2012 08:35 #30 by TPP
I used to perfer these:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.145 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+