Fox News proclaims era of Global Cooling has begun

FredHayek wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

FredHayek wrote: So this thread needs to be retitled, "Stuart Varney, in a laughing aside, proclaims the era of global cooling has begun."?

Nope, the original title is truthful and factual. Fox news journalist on his Fox news program seriously stated that the era of global cooling has begun. Varney is a representative of Fox News and was acting with his capacity of a representative of Fox News.

Your talking point people misled you again Dog. Stuart Varney is a pundit not a journalist. If you actually watched Fox instead of having it strained through Media Matters you would know this.

According to Fox News:
Veteran business journalist Stuart Varney serves as a business contributor and substitute host for FOX News Channel's (FNC) "Your World with Neil Cavuto" as well as the host of FOX Business Network's "Varney & Co." He joined FNC in January 2004.

Contributor and sub host are the key words. Would you call Rachel Maddow a journalist or a host?
There are usually two types of programs on news channels, actual news programs and talk shows. Varney was hosting a talk show.

FredHayek wrote: Contributor and sub host are the key words. Would you call Rachel Maddow a journalist or a host?
There are usually two types of programs on news channels, actual news programs and talk shows. Varney was hosting a talk show.

Nope, the bio says it all: Journalist

BlazerBob wrote: Life must be so simple if you define anyone who disagrees with you as a right wing hater who distorts everything.

Most of my sources are from respected sites. The majority come from a libertarian or conservative prospective and make reasoned points. The fact that not everyone agrees with the premise, logic or conclusions does not make them irrational or hateful.

Dog, perhaps you missed this. I thought you would sally forth to point out how hateful and distorted my threads are.

BlazerBob wrote:

BlazerBob wrote: Life must be so simple if you define anyone who disagrees with you as a right wing hater who distorts everything.

Most of my sources are from respected sites. The majority come from a libertarian or conservative prospective and make reasoned points. The fact that not everyone agrees with the premise, logic or conclusions does not make them irrational or hateful.

Dog, perhaps you missed this. I thought you would sally forth to point out how hateful and distorted my threads are.

Really Bob? Some of us actually have a life, family, friends, contributions to a productive economy rather than sit around every day serially posting on an obscure website in a forum that has maybe 5 or so posters. I find it sad that you, Fred, Rick, W**** have nothing more to do in life that serially post every few minutes in this forum.

Do you really expect me to review the sources of your links? Why would I waste my time? I've already shown that you were "incorrect" claiming that almost all of your posts deal with the failings of the education system and government power. If daily serial cutting and pasting hyperpartisan "outrages" gives you validity about your life, then go for it.

Something the Dog Said wrote: Really Bob? Some of us actually have a life, family, friends, contributions to a productive economy rather than sit around every day serially posting on an obscure website in a forum that has maybe 5 or so posters. I find it sad that you, Fred, Rick, W**** have nothing more to do in life that serially post every few minutes in this forum.

Do you really expect me to review the sources of your links? Why would I waste my time? I've already shown that you were "incorrect" claiming that almost all of your posts deal with the failings of the education system and government power. If daily serial cutting and pasting hyperpartisan "outrages" gives you validity about your life, then go for it.

He's condescending but of course Dog's not hateful.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

BlazerBob wrote:

BlazerBob wrote: Life must be so simple if you define anyone who disagrees with you as a right wing hater who distorts everything.

Most of my sources are from respected sites. The majority come from a libertarian or conservative prospective and make reasoned points. The fact that not everyone agrees with the premise, logic or conclusions does not make them irrational or hateful.

Dog, perhaps you missed this. I thought you would sally forth to point out how hateful and distorted my threads are.

Really Bob? Some of us actually have a life, family, friends, contributions to a productive economy rather than sit around every day serially posting on an obscure website in a forum that has maybe 5 or so posters. I find it sad that you, Fred, Rick, W**** have nothing more to do in life that serially post every few minutes in this forum.

Do you really expect me to review the sources of your links? Why would I waste my time? I've already shown that you were "incorrect" claiming that almost all of your posts deal with the failings of the education system and government power. If daily serial cutting and pasting hyperpartisan "outrages" gives you validity about your life, then go for it.

Tragic isn't it. Thank you for your concern.

Yeah dog, thanks for knowing what kind of life I have, or lack of. Maybe you could look in your cyrstal ball of liberal tolerance and tell us all what my newest waste of time is this week? (HINT: it's not putting down people I don't know)

It is what it is.