- Posts: 7163
- Thank you received: 21
LadyJazzer wrote: Tell you what...Why don't you tell us again how that's the "lowest number of people covered since 2008"....?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Which, of course, is a bullsh*t number, since millions of that 320 million are children 25 and under which can stay on their parent's policies until age 26 and aren't counted in the 4-million?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
pineinthegrass wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: Which, of course, is a bullsh*t number, since millions of that 320 million are children 25 and under which can stay on their parent's policies until age 26 and aren't counted in the 4-million?
Do you have some source to show that children up to age 26 are not counted in the four million?
I hope you realize that if you sign up for Obamacare and want coverage for your spouse or children, you also have to sign them up too and pay extra for each of their premiums. They are not covered automatically, nor for free. That's not new, that's how it's always worked.
So it would sure seem to me that they'd be counted as part of the 4 million as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Reverend Revelant wrote:
GreatGran wrote: What a surprise!
Sebelius says Obamacare premiums will go up next year
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius admitted Wednesday that Obamacare premiums will probably go up in 2015, that she does not know how many Obamacare customers have paid their premiums, and that she does not know how many Obamacare enrollees had insurance previously.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/12/sebel ... next-year/
This is precisely why the recent figure of 4.2 million enrollments is bogus. They don't know how many of those enrolled actually have paid for their insurance, they can't tell you how many of those enrolled are people who were part of the normal cycle of Medicare enrollments and they don't know how many who have enrolled were people who already had "policies that they liked" and were forced to renew under Obamacare.
This whole law was designed to help those who didn't have insurance and yet the figures released by HHS themselves (and a number of other firms that track this kind of data) show that they are no where close to covering the people who really needed this help.
And the young, healthy folks that were suppose to sign up to help support the financial burden of this law has not increased one bit. There has been a flat 25% of young people enrollment from day one, no where near the 37% they claimed they needed to make this law financially viable.
The GOP has been slammed and vilified for 3 years in regards to their attempts to modify or repeal this law, yet the administration themselves have made over 30 changes to the law since it's inception. And many of those changes were already suggested to the administration by the GOP and some Democrats.
Every change erodes this law and it's stability, piece by piece, part by part and it's collapsing under it's own weight. It's like a game of Jenga.
And we are 3 weeks out from the end of the enrollment period. Bottom line, this is going to cost everyone. This law is not helping poor people and this law is becoming a financial burden to the strapped middle class.
So much for any equitable equality.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
pineinthegrass wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: Which, of course, is a bullsh*t number, since millions of that 320 million are children 25 and under which can stay on their parent's policies until age 26 and aren't counted in the 4-million?
Do you have some source to show that children up to age 26 are not counted in the four million?
I hope you realize that if you sign up for Obamacare and want coverage for your spouse or children, you also have to sign them up too and pay extra for each of their premiums. They are not covered automatically, nor for free. That's not new, that's how it's always worked.
So it would sure seem to me that they'd be counted as part of the 4 million as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Do you have something to prove that they aren't?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote:
pineinthegrass wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: Which, of course, is a bullsh*t number, since millions of that 320 million are children 25 and under which can stay on their parent's policies until age 26 and aren't counted in the 4-million?
Do you have some source to show that children up to age 26 are not counted in the four million?
I hope you realize that if you sign up for Obamacare and want coverage for your spouse or children, you also have to sign them up too and pay extra for each of their premiums. They are not covered automatically, nor for free. That's not new, that's how it's always worked.
So it would sure seem to me that they'd be counted as part of the 4 million as well.
Do you have something to prove that they aren't? No one--including me--said they would be insured for free. The point is that they are eligible for coverage and part of the family plan.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.