Keystone XL to raise gas prices in Colorado significantly

16 Nov 2014 09:42 #41 by ZHawke
Careful, there, LOL. We don't want anyone to think big oil is making "record" profits, now do we?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2014 10:13 #42 by homeagain

BlazerBob wrote:

ZHawke wrote:

BlazerBob wrote:

ZHawke wrote: Several news outlets are now reporting the KXL Pipeline Project may be dead. This story from Addicting Info:

www.addictinginfo.org/2014/10/14/keystone-xl-dead/


It is not about that right now. The question is will the senate dems allow Landrow a hail marry for reelection.


I'm not so sure that is the case, BlazerBob. If, in fact, the pipeline is dead in the water as far as it running right through the middle of the U.S. is concerned, might that not have a corollary effect on what's going on with Senator Landrieu? I'm relatively new to this thread, but it would still seem to me if the KXL Pipeline "goes away" (at least from a U.S. perspective), that would make a lot of the current wrangling on the issue become moot, especially as it applies to Landrieu - unless I'm missing something here.


When in doubt, follow the $. From another left wing site.

thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/11/14/359...stone-landrieu-vote/

"On Thursday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest suggested to reporters that if Congress passed a bill approving the controversial northern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline, the President’s advisers would recommend he veto it. On Friday, the President himself said the pipeline take Canadian oil and sell it “everywhere else.” The mystery of whether or not Obama would use his third veto ever to stop a congressionally-mandated pipeline approval became relevant much sooner than expected because Senate Democratic leaders agreed to allow a vote as early as next week.
The reason, theoretically, would be a symbolic attempt to underline the support that still-embattled Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Chairwoman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has shown for the fossil fuel industry in order to boost her electoral prospects, a Senate Democratic aide told Bloomberg News. She faces a runoff election on December 6 after neither she nor her opponent, Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) cleared a majority of votes on November 4.
On Wednesday afternoon, just as the Senate began its post-midterm lame duck session, Landrieu went straight to the Senate floor to urge her colleagues to support her bill, the “Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act.”...


AND THEN....there is this "little litigation" that is STILL out there...

www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Obscure...pipeline-5896836.php

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 Nov 2014 07:35 #43 by FredHayek
So Mary Landrieu will get to vote for Keystone XL before her runoff and the POTUS will delay his veto until after the vote? :oregonwine: Win-win-wine!

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 10:31 #44 by PrintSmith

ZHawke wrote: Careful, there, LOL. We don't want anyone to think big oil is making "record" profits, now do we?

One could just as easily argue that the federal budget is a "record" one year after year after year on the basis that it never goes down in the same metric used to sustain the "record profits of "big oil" - dollars. Both arguments based solely on what the dollar figure is are disingenuous and deceptive ones to make. If you wish to make the argument that "big oil" (another pejorative phrase serially employed in a deceptive manner by the statists) is making an unheard of profit as a percentage of their business, which is never the argument offered, then we can have a fact based discussion on the issue, just as the federal budget needs to be examined as a percentage of the GDP instead of raw dollars in order for a fact based discussion to occur.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 10:46 #45 by FredHayek
Record profits? Is this done in percentages? Because they usually earn between 1-10%. I once owned part of a smaller oil company that contracted to sell at $75 that year when the spot market was at $110. Ouch. Didn't earn "record profits" that year. And I bet a lot of speculators are losing their butts with oil dropping below $75 this week.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 11:20 #46 by Blazer Bob

FredHayek wrote: Record profits? Is this done in percentages?......


No. Z has already conceded that on a percentage basis oil profits are pedestrian.

mymountaintown.com/forum/6-the-courthous...deral-loans?start=10
The following user(s) said Thank You: ZHawke

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 17:16 #47 by homeagain

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 17:36 #48 by Rick
Failed by one vote in the Senate, BYE BYE Mary and hello to a new vote in January.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Nov 2014 18:10 #49 by otisptoadwater

Rick wrote: Failed by one vote in the Senate, BYE BYE Mary and hello to a new vote in January.


From your lips to God's ears!

PS - Mary, don't let the door knob hit you where the good lord split'ya! You don't have to go home but you can't stay in office...

I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Nov 2014 07:19 #50 by FredHayek
So it will be voted on again in January and President Obama will veto it? Maybe the Canadian oil company can get him a high paid post retirement speaking gig to convince the POTUS to vote for American jobs.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.159 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+