- Posts: 10451
- Thank you received: 70
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I've thought this very thing for many years now... it's easier to imagine a world that you want than it is to face reality and work with it.Apparently, they compare the realities of our system with some utopian society that has never and will never exist. The perceived gap between the ideal society and the real world is a big source of distress for leftists."...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
BlazerBob wrote: I am sure that move on etc can and probably have taken the same data and come to completely different conclusions. Still the pp I extracted is an accurate take on my perception of many (not all) on the left. One of the thoughts I had but did not include in my comments on DU is that it might be nice to live in Utopia, but we don't.
www.frontpagemag.com/2014/steve-moeller/...d-leftists-are-angry
..."Leftist’s See the World as “Half-Empty”
Leftists, in contrast, tend to be more pessimistic and focused on what’s wrong with our society instead of what’s right with it. They have been conditioned to see the glass as half-empty instead of half full. Many leftists believe, as Karl Marx did, that the capitalist system is inherently unfair and morally wrong. People on the far left believe that they and many other people are victims of social and economic injustices. Apparently, they compare the realities of our system with some utopian society that has never and will never exist. The perceived gap between the ideal society and the real world is a big source of distress for leftists."...
Social democracy, an ideology advocating progressive reform of capitalism, emerged in the 20th century and was influenced by socialism. Yet unlike socialism, it was not collectivist nor anti-capitalist. It was not against the state; rather it was broadly defined as a project that aims to correct, through government reformism, what it regards as the intrinsic defects of capitalism by reducing inequalities. Several commentators have noted strong similarities between social liberalism and social democracy, with one political scientist even calling American liberalism "bootleg social democracy".
The meaning of "conservatism" in America has little in common with the way the word is used elsewhere, since what most Americans consider conservatism is what much of the world considers liberalism or neoliberalism.
The physicist says that the glass is not empty at all - it is half-filled with water and half-filled with air - hence, fully filled on the whole!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Do you really believe that or are you trying to summon the wicked witch? I don't agree that leftists or liberals or Democrats are empty headed at all, I think when it comes to politics, they have chosen a side just like we have and too often stick to their guns even when they see their leaders of choice blowing it, just like the right tends to do. But like you I disagree with how they think, especially when it comes to giving government more and more power over our lives. I know many liberals who are smarter than me in many ways because of their education or their experiences. That doesn't mean they are smarter when it comes to politics, that's always debatable.HEARTLESS wrote: I see Leftists as completely empty headed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Years ago I wrote that all elections in America center on four basic narratives:
(1) The triumphant individual who overcomes huge obstacles to eventually succeed (the Right says anyone with enough guts and gumption can make it; the Left focuses on equal opportunity.)
(2) The benevolent community that joins together to achieve the common good (the Right celebrates private charities such as "a thousand points of light;" the Left emphasizes public services).
3) The rot at the top, comprised of the privileged and powerful who conspire against the rest of us (the Right focuses on government; the Left, on big corporations and Wall Street).
(4) The mob at the gates that threaten us from beyond our borders (the Right worries about foreign powers; the Left worries more about global trade).
The first and second stories are about hope; the third and fourth about fear.
In the 2014 midterm elections, the two fearsome narratives predominate. Republican’s “rot at the top” is Obama and Obamacare; Democrat’s “rot at the top” should be big corporations suppressing wages and the Right suppressing votes, but they’re not telling that story.
Republicans’ “mob at the gates” are immigrants, terrorists, and Ebola. The Democrat’s “mob at the gates” should be growing totalitarianism and intolerance around the world, but they’re not telling that story, either.
Why aren't the Democrats telling their versions?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.