Just to set the record straight

bringing the thread back to jmc - thank you for your p.m. and your welcome.

as i mentioned in some posts i have recommended your website to other businesses until i ran into a snafu. i am familiar with highlandsranchbound and evergreenbound. are there any closer to denver in the works or up and running?

Mtntrekker, we have two new sites up and running this week. Flatironsbound.com and ArkansasHeadwatersbound.com (AHWbound.com).

Local_Historian wrote:

itsme wrote:

Local_Historian wrote: Well then, perhaps it is time to do as the person asked.

Wayne being here has no negative effect on the business of the place, any more than any of us being here. It had no negative effect on Pinecam; they have over 10,000 members and a great amount of local business support. Then there is the point that Wayne didn't create what became Pinecam as a business venture; rather, it turned into one on its own.

Your last comment - come after me Wayne, not anyone else - Wayne wasn't going after anyone; from all evidence, someone has been going after Wayne by harrassing his employer. Are you telling Wayne you are this person? Or are you making odd assumptions?

Park County court records are open to the public. I'm sure if someone wanted to take the time, they could easily find the case you are referencing and present the facts.

So whch is it to be, continuing badgering until someone does present the facts, or honoring the wishes of the person who told you to stop already? Or more specifically, to STFU?

BTW? Custmer is not always right, the customer is often wrong, and very few businesses use that model anymore. Something to be aware of.

You're concerned with the business here? Then perhaps you should send JMC a list of all the businesses and peple who refuse to come here purely because Wayne is here, and for no other reason. That way, JMC has an opportunity to address the issue with them directly.

You know how you know it's going to hurt when you rip a large bandage off so you you just pull it off really fast and deal with the pain? This is really going to hurt me to say this so I'm just going to blurt it out:

LOCAL_HISTORIAN IS RIGHT!!!

Holy crap! Does this mean the perfect beer has just been invented, or that the world has ended?
:party

I'm hoping for the perfect beer (is there such a thing) cause I've invested too much time on Christmas presents this year for the world to end before Christmas.

To you, Itsme

:woo hoo: :thumbsup:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Mtntrekker, we have two new sites up and running this week. Flatironsbound.com and ArkansasHeadwatersbound.com (AHWbound.com).

You two need your own site called boundtobebusy.com

AVs Good Twin wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Mtntrekker, we have two new sites up and running this week. Flatironsbound.com and ArkansasHeadwatersbound.com (AHWbound.com).

You two need your own site called boundtobebusy.com

Did I ever tell you you are half my workday? LOL

CinnamonGirl wrote:

AVs Good Twin wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote: Mtntrekker, we have two new sites up and running this week. Flatironsbound.com and ArkansasHeadwatersbound.com (AHWbound.com).

You two need your own site called boundtobebusy.com

Did I ever tell you you are half my workday? LOL

You're not the first woman to tell me this LOL

you know i was really going to let this go but since there is add on - but i will be nice.

if you piss off a lot of people like wayne does on a site that he has some association and that site shows a broadcasting station that others are familiar with then there will be fallout, especially when wayne attacks someone personally who isn't even part of the site.

and i am sad to say it affects this business too as others won't come to the site and will yell about it elsewhere. sorry it went that way.

Local_Historian wrote: {sarcasm} Oh you're right - from now on, I should read every thread and memorize them all. {/sarcasm}

No, I didn't just jump in. I've followed this drama since it started, over the various threads, because I respect Wayne and have a vast dislike of people who cannot (or refuse to) separate online from offline.

But hey, whatever floats your boat. If the angst you present makes you happy, go for it.

thanks coming from a failed editor. now go back to kissing his a$$. you two do well together.

How's Pat?

mtntrekker wrote: i wasn't the one bringing up the other person, not even defending until i had more information. i will honor this family's wishes as to this person.

Well, yeah, actually you were the one bringing up the other person.

mtntrekker wrote: LH i have the stats - when wayne went after someone, egging the neighbors on and showing up at their hearing and doing other stuff to other individuals who complained he alienated a group of people. wayne really needs to check his claims in these posts considering there have been a number of settlements on the issues. but that is another issue and i am not a party to it.

My response to your post was that it happened 5 or 6 years ago and was to answer your erroneous accusations. You should check your own claims before you shoot your mouth off. It's public record. Since you claim you were not a party to it, I'm not sure why you felt it was your duty to mention it or bring someone else into the discussion who isn't here.

mtntrekker wrote: especially when wayne attacks someone personally who isn't even part of the site.

It wasn't me "attacking" someone "personally." I never mentioned anyone's name, as that would be a violation of this site's Terms of Service. I was responding to your attack on me when YOU brought that other person into the conversation first. You knew they aren't registered here. You knew their health status and yet you chose to introduce them anyway.

I thought that was the end of it after you said you would honor someone's wishes not to continue down that road, but apparently you won't honor their wishes not to discuss it. That's on you -- not me. Now, I have to respond to your continued posts again to set the record straight. It's very apparent from your name calling and bringing up something that happened 5 or 6 years ago that you carry a grudge.

mtntrekker wrote: go back to panhandling on the streets rather than working expecting others to take care of you.

Wow, I posted one time many years ago that when I first came to Colorado on a bicycle from Texas I panhandled in Boulder for a week because someone stole my wallet. I got a job the next week. As a point of fact, less than 10 years after I started from scratch in Colorado I landed a job with a global organization and have been there for 28 years, receiving a number of industry awards and company recognitions during that time. So don't think your snarky "failed editor" comments bother me one bit. But for you to bring up something on this forum that I did for a week in 1973 just creeps me out. It sounds like you've been stalking me for some time and taking notes. That is just creepy by anyone's standard.

You are the one who started all this by calling me names in several threads -- out of the blue. I had no interaction with you before you started the name calling. I have been nothing but respectful to you in my responses and I will continue to be.

mtntrekker wrote: i am one of about 500 hispanics who think that wayne is less than professional.

wayne when a whole bunch of people go yelling about you it isn't me...

The truth is, there aren't a whole bunch of people yelling about me. There's only you and the people you conjure up in your mind -- like the "500 Hispanics" who somehow think I'm "less than professional" because you told them so. Making them up in your mind doesn't count. Complaining about me to 500 people who don't know me from Adam doesn't count either. It only confirms to them you are a busy body. I very much doubt they would condone you stalking me.

Finally, I feel for ANYONE who is fighting cancer, as I have had my own battle with it (2 years cancer free!). Whoever it is you are talking about, I wish them only the very best in their struggle and a speedy recovery. That goes for Spykster and anyone else reading this who is battling cancer.