Q******* Marriages Passes State Senate

27 Mar 2011 12:25 #171 by Residenttroll returns

sysymN wrote: Taking your "logic" to the next level, Residenttroll, then oral sex is a perversion, since the the primary function of the penis is for procreation. Anal sex between a man and a woman is a perversion, since it is not an act for procreation. Married heterosexual couples that choose to not have children are perverted, since they only have sex for pleasure and not procreation.


Thanks for your most excellent FIRST post. Go stick a screwdriver in the electric socket and tell me about the thrill you get from it. Yea, the screwdriver fits but that doesn't mean it was designed for that purpose. Question: If a man and woman perform anal sex, are they using those body parts for their intended purposes or just getting sexual pleasure? Do you drive down a one way street because it's fun playing chicken with cars?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 13:47 #172 by Nobody that matters

residenttroll wrote: Do you drive down a one way street because it's fun playing chicken with cars?


Why, yes... I do. Was that you cussing at me after you chickened out?

:biggrin:

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 14:48 #173 by Kate

residenttroll wrote:

sysymN wrote: Taking your "logic" to the next level, Residenttroll, then oral sex is a perversion, since the the primary function of the penis is for procreation. Anal sex between a man and a woman is a perversion, since it is not an act for procreation. Married heterosexual couples that choose to not have children are perverted, since they only have sex for pleasure and not procreation.


Thanks for your most excellent FIRST post. Go stick a screwdriver in the electric socket and tell me about the thrill you get from it. Yea, the screwdriver fits but that doesn't mean it was designed for that purpose. Question: If a man and woman perform anal sex, are they using those body parts for their intended purposes or just getting sexual pleasure? Do you drive down a one way street because it's fun playing chicken with cars?


If it's not natural, then how do you explain the homosexual behaviour in animals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

On top of that, the penis was also designed for elimination of urine, was it not? That seems to be a primary purpose, so using your logic again, anything other than urination is not natural, since the most often used function of the penis is to pee. Therefore, sex is not natural.

Your logic suggests that sex would be unnatural, unless it is for procreation only. Care to answer the questions I posted?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 15:07 #174 by major bean

sysymN wrote: If it's not natural, then how do you explain the homosexual behaviour in animals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

On top of that, the penis was also designed for elimination of urine, was it not? That seems to be a primary purpose, so using your logic again, anything other than urination is not natural, since the most often used function of the penis is to pee. Therefore, sex is not natural.

Your logic suggests that sex would be unnatural, unless it is for procreation only. Care to answer the questions I posted?

Conspiracy theorists see everything colored in the light of conspiracy. They make quite a few compelling arguments. But their reasoning is just wrong.
The same thing with homosexuals. There are no homosexuals occuring naturally in nature among animal species. Homosexual behavior occurs as an abberation whenever natural balance is disturbed. But if you have your interpretation colored in the light of homosexuality, then one can make some compelling arguments. But the reasoning is wrong.

Another interesting phenomenon is that homosexuals see homosexuals everywhere. Just as pot smokers interpret behavior in others as the results of smoking pot. It is their interpretation of the world. But is just incorrect.

Thinking that one part of the anatomy has just one use is wrong thinking. But also thinking that ALL uses of a limb is natural is just wrong thinking. A man's dick has only two purposes: urinating and ejaculation. Of course, if you are man enough, you might use it to drive nails and more power to you if you can accomplish it.

The anus has ONLY ONE purpose. All other uses are perversions of nature. Being attracted to an anus is perverted. Licking the anus is perverted. It is not natural in humans.
If a male is attracted to a female's anus, that is perverted. If a male is attracted to another male's anus, that is perverted. And the resulting activity creates quite a stink, I would suppose..

Regards,
Major Bean

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 16:06 #175 by Residenttroll returns
:yeahthat:

Finally, someone gets it! Thank you so much Major Bean for answering the questions that libtards wouldn't.

Now, back to the queering of marriages in Colorado - that's the purpose of civil unions.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 17:26 #176 by Kate

major bean wrote:

sysymN wrote: If it's not natural, then how do you explain the homosexual behaviour in animals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

On top of that, the penis was also designed for elimination of urine, was it not? That seems to be a primary purpose, so using your logic again, anything other than urination is not natural, since the most often used function of the penis is to pee. Therefore, sex is not natural.

Your logic suggests that sex would be unnatural, unless it is for procreation only. Care to answer the questions I posted?

Conspiracy theorists see everything colored in the light of conspiracy. They make quite a few compelling arguments. But their reasoning is just wrong.
The same thing with homosexuals. There are no homosexuals occuring naturally in nature among animal species. Homosexual behavior occurs as an abberation whenever natural balance is disturbed. But if you have your interpretation colored in the light of homosexuality, then one can make some compelling arguments. But the reasoning is wrong.

Another interesting phenomenon is that homosexuals see homosexuals everywhere. Just as pot smokers interpret behavior in others as the results of smoking pot. It is their interpretation of the world. But is just incorrect.

Thinking that one part of the anatomy has just one use is wrong thinking. But also thinking that ALL uses of a limb is natural is just wrong thinking. A man's dick has only two purposes: urinating and ejaculation. Of course, if you are man enough, you might use it to drive nails and more power to you if you can accomplish it.

The anus has ONLY ONE purpose. All other uses are perversions of nature. Being attracted to an anus is perverted. Licking the anus is perverted. It is not natural in humans.
If a male is attracted to a female's anus, that is perverted. If a male is attracted to another male's anus, that is perverted. And the resulting activity creates quite a stink, I would suppose..


In your opinion.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 17:30 #177 by Residenttroll returns

sysymN wrote:

major bean wrote:

sysymN wrote: If it's not natural, then how do you explain the homosexual behaviour in animals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

On top of that, the penis was also designed for elimination of urine, was it not? That seems to be a primary purpose, so using your logic again, anything other than urination is not natural, since the most often used function of the penis is to pee. Therefore, sex is not natural.

Your logic suggests that sex would be unnatural, unless it is for procreation only. Care to answer the questions I posted?

Conspiracy theorists see everything colored in the light of conspiracy. They make quite a few compelling arguments. But their reasoning is just wrong.
The same thing with homosexuals. There are no homosexuals occuring naturally in nature among animal species. Homosexual behavior occurs as an abberation whenever natural balance is disturbed. But if you have your interpretation colored in the light of homosexuality, then one can make some compelling arguments. But the reasoning is wrong.

Another interesting phenomenon is that homosexuals see homosexuals everywhere. Just as pot smokers interpret behavior in others as the results of smoking pot. It is their interpretation of the world. But is just incorrect.

Thinking that one part of the anatomy has just one use is wrong thinking. But also thinking that ALL uses of a limb is natural is just wrong thinking. A man's dick has only two purposes: urinating and ejaculation. Of course, if you are man enough, you might use it to drive nails and more power to you if you can accomplish it.

The anus has ONLY ONE purpose. All other uses are perversions of nature. Being attracted to an anus is perverted. Licking the anus is perverted. It is not natural in humans.
If a male is attracted to a female's anus, that is perverted. If a male is attracted to another male's anus, that is perverted. And the resulting activity creates quite a stink, I would suppose..


In your opinion.

:rofl :rofl

Wow, that's a deep and thought provoking response.
:rofl :rofl

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 17:43 #178 by Kate

residenttroll wrote:

sysymN wrote:

major bean wrote:

sysymN wrote: If it's not natural, then how do you explain the homosexual behaviour in animals?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior

On top of that, the penis was also designed for elimination of urine, was it not? That seems to be a primary purpose, so using your logic again, anything other than urination is not natural, since the most often used function of the penis is to pee. Therefore, sex is not natural.

Your logic suggests that sex would be unnatural, unless it is for procreation only. Care to answer the questions I posted?

Conspiracy theorists see everything colored in the light of conspiracy. They make quite a few compelling arguments. But their reasoning is just wrong.
The same thing with homosexuals. There are no homosexuals occuring naturally in nature among animal species. Homosexual behavior occurs as an abberation whenever natural balance is disturbed. But if you have your interpretation colored in the light of homosexuality, then one can make some compelling arguments. But the reasoning is wrong.

Another interesting phenomenon is that homosexuals see homosexuals everywhere. Just as pot smokers interpret behavior in others as the results of smoking pot. It is their interpretation of the world. But is just incorrect.

Thinking that one part of the anatomy has just one use is wrong thinking. But also thinking that ALL uses of a limb is natural is just wrong thinking. A man's dick has only two purposes: urinating and ejaculation. Of course, if you are man enough, you might use it to drive nails and more power to you if you can accomplish it.

The anus has ONLY ONE purpose. All other uses are perversions of nature. Being attracted to an anus is perverted. Licking the anus is perverted. It is not natural in humans.
If a male is attracted to a female's anus, that is perverted. If a male is attracted to another male's anus, that is perverted. And the resulting activity creates quite a stink, I would suppose..


In your opinion.

:rofl :rofl

Wow, that's a deep and thought provoking response.
:rofl :rofl


Are you always this rude to people that disagree with you?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 17:55 #179 by Nmysys
And what you define as perverted, other cultures, both historic and contemporary, have defined as normal. Stop being so parochial.

Are these same cultures, those, who the Left wants us to turn into?

Yes the Europeans have shown to be much more open about sexuality, nudity, etc.

But that doesn't make it right, to us or for us!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Mar 2011 18:42 #180 by Pony Soldier

Trouble wrote: I love how RT single-handedly debated all of ya'll...and won! :bravo:

I will say RT, you do have a way with words!


Interesting that you think he won. From my point of view, he came away looking like a closet homosexual afraid of his own identity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.195 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+