An OPEN letter to this site

homeagain wrote: Jim and Cinnamon Girl......I have responded to your e.mails and am looking forward to that cup of coffee Jim.

Local_Historian wrote: That's nice you responded to PMs - how about responding tot he rest of us?

Exactly Local Historian!

The poster chose to start a thread to bring attention to his/her point of view rather than send a pm to the administration.
Now, he/she prefers to correspond by email?

Fact of the matter is he/she should have expressed their point of view in an email to begin with in stead of involving any registered members here.
Wait....that would not have been near so dramatic and the opportunity to discredit or embarrass this website would have been lost.

My only question is what I said on PC to not be able to sign in anymore with no explanation. I have a few PMs I would like to retrieve from before we started Communities Bound.

*waits for the flounce and the flounceback*

CG...Why worry at all about what they are doing over there.
Look to the future here.

Becky wrote: CG...Why worry at all about what they are doing over there.
Look to the future here.

No worries I am not losing sleep over it. LOL

Not the first person to have this happen to. Go look at my last post and tell me what I did. :thumbsup:

Becky wrote:

homeagain wrote: Jim and Cinnamon Girl......I have responded to your e.mails and am looking forward to that cup of coffee Jim.

Local_Historian wrote: That's nice you responded to PMs - how about responding tot he rest of us?

Exactly Local Historian!

The poster chose to start a thread to bring attention to his/her point of view rather than send a pm to the administration.
Now, he/she prefers to correspond by email?

Fact of the matter is he/she should have expressed their point of view in an email to begin with in stead of involving any registered members here.
Wait....that would not have been near so dramatic and the opportunity to discredit or embarrass this website would have been lost.

Eh - I say let it go, that's how we roll over here, laid back and mellow. One of the reasons I prefer this site, this person felt frustrated, vented, and now their issues are being address by her - which is how it should be. I don't think it matters that it was opened in public, perhaps it's best it the issues were addressed privately since the concern involved a mod.

Scooby72 wrote: Eh - I say let it go, that's how we roll over here, laid back and mellow. One of the reasons I prefer this site, this person felt frustrated, vented, and now their issues are being address by her - which is how it should be. I don't think it matters that it was opened in public, perhaps it's best it the issues were addressed privately since the concern involved a mod.

Cool, does that mean we've gotten to the part of the thread where we can make fun of all those involved and take the subject on wild tangents?

LOL Yeppers!

homeagain wrote: It is my belief that the ability to take the high road is a trait that is becoming a rare commodity. I have refrained from making comments
about this sites behavior,because I felt given some space and time the acrimony would subside. HOWEVER,this afternoons post in the
IMHS announcement thread by one of your own staff (?) was beyond the pale and insulting. My respect for this site (and the individual
who created the post) has been GREATLY diminished. The questionable behavior on another site (by this poster) SHOULD be reviewed
and perhaps a GROUP discussion is in order for your staff.......JMO

thank you homeagain for expressing your opinion, which you can do here, and following up with jmc. good people to talk to here if you have concerns.

Did you get banned CG without any notice and without breaking the TOS? That NEVER happens because they've told us so time after time.