JMC wrote: How about for fun, since all winnings go to charity, we have to pick dogs or pushes? Then we have more incentive to analyze. VL you should still kick all of our collective asses.
Why did'nt we just pick against the spread then? Nobody wanted to do that? The spread makes every game a 50/50 prposition..Lets go with the spread then.
JMC wrote: How about for fun, since all winnings go to charity, we have to pick dogs or pushes? Then we have more incentive to analyze. VL you should still kick all of our collective asses.
Why did'nt we just pick against the spread then? Nobody wanted to do that? The spread makes every game a 50/50 prposition..Lets go with the spread then.
JMC wrote: Idea, How about we have to pick a push or dog? Rather than favs. More interesting don't you think?
The people here couldn't understand the point spread thing..And favorites don't always win...Nobodies going 62-0 here- The constest has begun
BTW- who's in? How many people do i gotta beat? And who's keeping score?
I'm 2-0
JMC I thought I picked the hard ones.
I should have stuck with the easy picks like VL did and I would be 2-0 too.
I just called my 2 kids that are away at college and told them to drop their classes imeadiatly and come home..Dads got a new idea...We're all gonna go to Vegas and just bet the "easy ones"..Were not gonna play the hard ones, just the "easy" ones..Why did'nt I think of this sooner
I just called some of my degenerate gambler friends and told them from now on to just bet "the easy ones." Everyone seems to agree that that is probably a great idea..
Hey! I was just thinking Viking, this ingenius system of yours might work with stocks too...Just buy the "easy" stocks, the winnners..And don't buy losers...Just buy the ones that are sure to go up in value, that way you can't lose your money...
What do you think? I'm gonna do a little day trading tomarow using your system..
JMC wrote: How about for fun, since all winnings go to charity, we have to pick dogs or pushes? Then we have more incentive to analyze. VL you should still kick all of our collective asses.
Why did'nt we just pick against the spread then? Nobody wanted to do that? The spread makes every game a 50/50 prposition..Lets go with the spread then.
CinnamonGirl wrote: Straight up..... I pick Washington over Dallas, KC over SD, Denver over Jacksonville.
Shanny should win in his first game. SD does not have LT, and I am a Denver native. Those are my reasons. LOL :smiledance:
WOW!! You are the new football guru! I can't believe you picked Washington and KC and got them right. I know you picked Denver cuz you are a fan. But I think I will now follow your picks. I would have never picked those two. Great job!
If I would have known it was gonna rain I'd have never picked the Chiefs..That was totaly unexpected and it was a huge disadvantage for the speedier Chargers... I'm sure they did'nt pack their rain cleats for the game...
Vice Lord wrote: If I would have known it was gonna rain I'd have never picked the Chiefs..That was totaly unexpected and it was a huge disadvantage for the speedier Chargers... I'm sure they did'nt pack their rain cleats for the game...
You didn't pick the Chiefs, Vice Loser, Only dogs from now on, deal>
CinnamonGirl wrote: Straight up..... I pick Washington over Dallas, KC over SD, Denver over Jacksonville.
Shanny should win in his first game. SD does not have LT, and I am a Denver native. Those are my reasons. LOL :smiledance:
WOW!! You are the new football guru! I can't believe you picked Washington and KC and got them right. I know you picked Denver cuz you are a fan. But I think I will now follow your picks. I would have never picked those two. Great job!
:smiledance:
