Is Palin a traitor?

Who said anything about Sarah making it up... Sarah merely used it in a sentence applying it to herself... Haw, haw, haw...

Y'all have fun now, y'hear... I could sit and watch your delusion for hours...

major bean wrote: Physical beauty does not involve "pedicures and manicures" or "jewelery and makeup". These are used to add beauty to something that is not attractive (lipstick on a pig). The unfailing test is a bucket of water poured over the head of the woman. If she is beautiful soaking wet, then she is beautiful.
"pedicures and manicures" or "jewelery and makeup" are not beauty.

But being on TV and having money are?

LadyJazzer wrote: Who said anything about Sarah making it up... Sarah merely used it in a sentence applying it to herself... Haw, haw, haw...

Y'all have fun now, y'hear... I could sit and watch your delusion for hours...

Are you stupid or what?! It was a sexist smear by Obama against Sarah Palin. All you remember is Sarah's reply to this crude remark. Now you have proved beyond doubt that you are a close minded, partisan, liberal, ignoramous. (Or maybe you have the hots for Obama?)

'Lipstick on a pig': Attack on Palin or common line?
September 10, 2008
John McCain's campaign says the line was an attack on Sarah Palin.

Sen. Barack Obama's reference to "lipstick on a pig" has Republicans demanding an apology and Democrats accusing Sen. John McCain of a "pathetic attempt" to play the gender card.

the link: http://articles.cnn.com/2008-09-10/politics/campaign.lipstick_1_mccain-campaign-john-mccain-swift-boat?_s=PM:POLITICS

major bean wrote: Are you stupid or what?! It was a sexist smear by Obama against Sarah Palin. All you remember is Sarah's reply to this crude remark. Now you have proved beyond doubt that you are a close minded, partisan, liberal, ignoramous. (Or maybe you have the hots for Obama?)

We all know now that you have the hots for Sarah.

archer wrote:

major bean wrote: Physical beauty does not involve "pedicures and manicures" or "jewelery and makeup". These are used to add beauty to something that is not attractive (lipstick on a pig). The unfailing test is a bucket of water poured over the head of the woman. If she is beautiful soaking wet, then she is beautiful.
"pedicures and manicures" or "jewelery and makeup" are not beauty.

But being on TV and having money are?

That is quite a leap. You seem to be having trouble creating coherent replies.

archer wrote:

major bean wrote: Are you stupid or what?! It was a sexist smear by Obama against Sarah Palin. All you remember is Sarah's reply to this crude remark. Now you have proved beyond doubt that you are a close minded, partisan, liberal, ignoramous. (Or maybe you have the hots for Obama?)

We all know now that you have the hots for Sarah.

I have no lust for Sarah Palin. There are things about her character that I find not to my taste.

major bean wrote: That is quite a leap. You seem to be having trouble creating coherent replies.

You betcha I do.....trying to make any kind of sense out of your posts is difficult at best.

archer wrote:

major bean wrote: That is quite a leap. You seem to be having trouble creating coherent replies.

You betcha I do.....trying to make any kind of sense out of your posts is difficult at best.

Archer, your trouble with my posts is in your vain attempts to twist, wriggle, stretch so that you can make some catty, snide remark as a reply. You are just catty.

My posts are to the point.

major bean wrote: Archer, your trouble with my posts is in your vain attempts to twist, wriggle, stretch so that you can make some catty, snide remark as a reply. You are just catty.

You reap what you sow major bean. and you have been sowing a lot of anger around here.

archer wrote:

major bean wrote: Archer, your trouble with my posts is in your vain attempts to twist, wriggle, stretch so that you can make some catty, snide remark as a reply. You are just catty.

You reap what you sow major bean.

THAT was my point, archer.