- Posts: 6722
- Thank you received: 72
PonyTail wrote: Please forgive me Wayne. You were just trying to show us that Rick Perry was not a man of his word and I was trying to get the point across that Rick Perry didn't sell out Texas nor would he sell out the USA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
WayneH wrote:
PonyTail wrote: Please forgive me Wayne. You were just trying to show us that Rick Perry was not a man of his word and I was trying to get the point across that Rick Perry didn't sell out Texas nor would he sell out the USA
That explanation has nothing to do with the fact you stated I have a love affair with Obama and that you inferred I am close minded.
I challenged you to show from my recent posts that I am happy with Obama and so far, you haven't responded.
I have a lot of problems with Obama, as I stated before, including his hiring staff members from previous administrations and his failure to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in a timely matter, and his continuation of the Gitmo. I don't know how you'd see that as a "love affair."
(I have an H after my name because that's my initial, BTW).
Perry sold out the Texans who voted for him. There's no getting around that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
WASHINGTON, D.C. (AP) - Texas Governor Rick Perry's announcement Saturday that he would be seeking the presidency, spurred political insiders to wonder if the Heavenly Father had tipped His hand. The Governor had been on record that he would be consulting God on the decision.
Heavenly Kingdom Press Secretary Simon Peter dashed speculation by releasing this statement quickly on the heels of the Governor's announcment:
"Despite rumors to the contrary and multiple candidates claiming otherwise, Our Heavenly Father has yet to endorse a specific candidate in the upcoming election. There are many fine candidates in the running and His Omnipotency looks forward to hearing what they all have to say before making any formal announcements of support."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
As an INDY,I believe your statement(bolded) to be DEAD ON........I just saw Bachmann on Meet the Press and I believe she will do the R's IMMENSE damage in the long run......BUT, I will give her this she stays on point and deflects questions like a true pro....JMOlionshead2010 wrote:
WayneH wrote:
PonyTail wrote: Please forgive me Wayne. You were just trying to show us that Rick Perry was not a man of his word and I was trying to get the point across that Rick Perry didn't sell out Texas nor would he sell out the USA
That explanation has nothing to do with the fact you stated I have a love affair with Obama and that you inferred I am close minded.
I challenged you to show from my recent posts that I am happy with Obama and so far, you haven't responded.
I have a lot of problems with Obama, as I stated before, including his hiring staff members from previous administrations and his failure to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in a timely matter, and his continuation of the Gitmo. I don't know how you'd see that as a "love affair."
(I have an H after my name because that's my initial, BTW).
Perry sold out the Texans who voted for him. There's no getting around that.
Hey Wayne, you may not be happy with President Obama but I'm betting you and all your liberal friends will be voting for him no matter what. So I think it's safe to say you will not be voting for Governor Perry or ANY other person with an (R) after their name.
I find it interesting that everyone on the left is busy salting the earth around Governor Perry from the moment he announces. None of this, "give him a few days to state his case". You have reserved your endless patience for our currently failing President. We won't talk about how many times President Obama has sold out to one interest group or another. But the liberal bias blinds you and your liberal friends here and nationwide.
I'm also amazed how people who call themselves "progressive" can imply that an entire state of people is stupid.
You aren't going to vote for a Republican in the primaries. You are going to vote for Obama no matter what, so why salt the earth of the opposing candidate? What is your objective? I don't get it.
My take is that if we re-elect President Obama we are in very deep trouble as a nation. Unfortunately, it appears that we conservative Republicans are hellbent on putting up a candidate who is so polarizing that we will lose the moderate, independent vote anyway. Our own "take no prisoners, make no compromise" approach will fail. In essence, we are hellbent on re-electing the current President. We are our own worst enemy.
Add to that a cult that will vote for President Obama no matter what he does or fails to do....and you have a recipe for disaster. We are toast.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kate wrote: Rick Perry Announces, God Issues Statement Of Clarification
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Science tells us that Perry’s message combined with the current political and economic turmoil may drive voters in his direction. Professors Aaron Kay, Adam Galinsky and their colleagues examined whether changing political climates can drive religious belief, especially faith in a controlling or interventionist deity. Their work was published last year in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. They sought to determine how external systems of control could compensate for one another. They found that perceptions of decreased government stability led to increased beliefs in a controlling God. Conversely, beliefs in an interventionist God diminished with perceptions of a stable government.
I speculate that an electorate that turns to God will also embrace candidates who share that response. I believe that Governor Perry, whether intentional or not, has chosen a political platform that capitalizes on the behavior described by Kay and Galinsky.
One has to wonder, though, whether Perry truly believes that God is the answer for America’s economic problems. In April, Perry held a three-day prayer vigil to bring rain to his state of Texas. The AP reported on June 29 that the U.S. Agriculture Department had designated 213 of Texas’ counties as disaster areas due to drought and the remaining 41 also qualified for federal assistance. In recent days, Perry has been pushing for additional support from Washington, D.C.
The true answer is apparently something Perry and the Tea Party rail against: the federal government.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
lionshead2010 wrote:
WayneH wrote:
PonyTail wrote: Please forgive me Wayne. You were just trying to show us that Rick Perry was not a man of his word and I was trying to get the point across that Rick Perry didn't sell out Texas nor would he sell out the USA
That explanation has nothing to do with the fact you stated I have a love affair with Obama and that you inferred I am close minded.
I challenged you to show from my recent posts that I am happy with Obama and so far, you haven't responded.
I have a lot of problems with Obama, as I stated before, including his hiring staff members from previous administrations and his failure to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan in a timely matter, and his continuation of the Gitmo. I don't know how you'd see that as a "love affair."
(I have an H after my name because that's my initial, BTW).
Perry sold out the Texans who voted for him. There's no getting around that.
Hey Wayne, you may not be happy with President Obama but I'm betting you and all your liberal friends will be voting for him no matter what. So I think it's safe to say you will not be voting for Governor Perry or ANY other person with an (R) after their name.
I find it interesting that everyone on the left is busy salting the earth around Governor Perry from the moment he announces. None of this, "give him a few days to state his case". You have reserved your endless patience for our currently failing President. We won't talk about how many times President Obama has sold out to one interest group or another. But the liberal bias blinds you and your liberal friends here and nationwide.
I'm also amazed how people who call themselves "progressive" can imply that an entire state of people is stupid.
You aren't going to vote for a Republican in the primaries. You are going to vote for Obama no matter what, so why salt the earth of the opposing candidate? What is your objective? I don't get it.
My take is that if we re-elect President Obama we are in very deep trouble as a nation. Unfortunately, it appears that we conservative Republicans are hellbent on putting up a candidate who is so polarizing that we will lose the moderate, independent vote anyway. Our own "take no prisoners, make no compromise" approach will fail. In essence, we are hellbent on re-electing the current President. We are our own worst enemy.
Add to that a cult that will vote for President Obama no matter what he does or fails to do....and you have a recipe for disaster. We are toast.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who ends his shadow run for the White House this weekend by announcing his bid for the GOP presidential nomination, has been touting the success of the Lone Star State’s economy, which, he says has done significantly better than the rest of the country through the Great Recession.
“We keep adding jobs while others are losing them left and right,” he told the Republican Leadership Conference during its mid-June meeting in New Orleans. Some analysts say that Perry will enjoy a strong advantage over others in the crowded Republican field because of his state’s near-miraculous record of job creation throughout one of the worst economic periods in U.S. history.
There’s just one problem with that portrayal. While Texas has created more jobs than any other state in the past two years, the increase is far less than advertised. The rate of increase is not much higher than a number of other states, including former rustbelt centers like Pennsylvania or liberal sanctuaries like Vermont.
Moreover, its recent performance is a classic case of “all hat, no cattle.” Texas lost 34,000 jobs in June, causing its unemployment rate to jump to 8.2 percent, which ranks it 25th among states and leaving it worse off than its immediate neighbors. Even as Texas’ unemployment rate rose along the lines of the entire country, the neighboring states of Louisiana and New Mexico saw their unemployment rates fall to 7.8 percent and 6.8 percent, respectively.
According to a recent analysis in the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, state debt grew by 282 percent over the last decade, a slightly faster rate of increase than the ostensibly more profligate federal government. Local government debt in Texas grew by a heady 220 percent over the same period.
The result is that while state and local governments nationwide have eliminated over 400,000 jobs in the past year, government employment in Texas actually grew. There are now 1.66 million state and local government employees in Texas, an increase of 66,000 in the past two-and-a-half years.
But that’s about to change. While the state used its oil surpluses to recreate its rainy day fund, Perry and the Republican legislature slashed over $5 billion from state education budgets in order to avoid raising other taxes. The result has been a wave of announced teacher and other school employee layoffs for the fall. A spokesman for the Texas State Teachers Association said as many as 50,000 out of 333,000 teacher jobs could be eliminated in the next two years.
Perry's statement conjures visions of America as Slacker Nation, where the overburdened wagon-pullers drag an increasingly heavy burden of freeloaders. His number is correct but, like other conservatives who have seized on the statistic, Perry draws from it a dangerously misleading lesson.
The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates that 46.4 percent of households will owe no federal income tax in 2011. This is, for the most part, not because people have chosen to loaf. It's because they are working but simply don't earn enough to owe income taxes, based on the progressive structure of the tax code and provisions designed to help the working poor and lower-income seniors.
As the Tax Policy Center's Roberton Williams explains, "a couple with two children earning less than $26,400 will pay no federal income tax this year because their $11,600 standard deduction and four exemptions of $3,700 each reduce their taxable income to zero. The basic structure of the income tax simply exempts subsistence levels of income from tax."
Consider: Of those households who do not owe income taxes, about a third earn $10,000 a year and a slightly smaller share earn between $10,000 and $20,000. More than three-fourths earn $30,000 or less.
Does Perry truly see this as an "injustice"? Does he believe his "dismay" should be alleviated by raising the tax burden on these households?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.