What the Corridor REALLY Needs is Another Shopping Center

08 Sep 2011 17:28 #51 by LadyJazzer
I would prefer a natural hillside with trees, rocks and wildflowers....and NO light pollution.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 17:29 #52 by HEARTLESS
Are you hiding out behind the Kum & Go?

The silent majority will be silent no more.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 17:30 #53 by Martin Ent Inc

Local_Historian wrote:

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Concerning the building at KV.
We could all pool together gut the interior and have a skating rink with a viewing balcony from the second floor????

Roller or ice? I would prefer roller.



Big enough, could maybe do both.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 17:47 #54 by The Viking

LadyJazzer wrote: I would prefer a natural hillside with trees, rocks and wildflowers....and NO light pollution.


Not sure how long you have lived in the foothills here but there are millions of acres of that. I see it everywhere. But let's bitch about where your house was built too. THAT use to be a natural hillside with rocks and trees and no whiney human too! And if you want no light pollution, then you better keep your lights off or you are a total hypocrite!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 17:49 #55 by The Viking

Local_Historian wrote:

The Viking wrote:

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Kings Valley is what Wayne is refering to.
Not the King Sooper center.

And we live 40 minutes from anywhere soo...


Sorry, wasn't talking about you Martin. LJ and a couple others seem to love to bitch about everything in our community no matter what it is. That is why I am not on here as much. Too many negative people who have no life. And I misread. Thought it said KS as that is what we were talking about. And KV will be adding tenants in the next 6 months or so from what I have heard. We will see. Good to have more jobs up here. Saves the fuel driving down the hill. Less traffic, less accidents, more employed, more homes saved, values go back up.


In the next 6 months. How many times have we heard "in the next 6 months" from them? I'm serious. I head all kinds of good things about everyone who was coming in by the end of 2009 - and yet it remains empty two years later. Where is the organic foods story? The radiology firm? Both promised to be in there by September 2009. Well, it's September 2011, and the place is still empty. And still has the same broken window it's had for over a year and a half now. It's not being negative to realize when you're being lied to, and to not buy any story from certain people until the proof is actually in action.

The insults from you are wearing thin. Being realistic doesn't mean we have no lives. Stop the junior high insults already.


Pointing out all the constant bitching about living up here is not junior high insults. If people want to keep bitching about where they live, then MOVE! Sick of all the negative people who live up here! And your insults and attacks on me saying it is junior high is wearing thin. FYI!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 17:56 #56 by chickaree
I doubt she keeps sodium vapor lights glaring from sunset to dawn. Perhaps you are amenable to having such intrusions thrust upon you but not all of us are. Development can be done thoughtfully. Most developments up here have been with a few glaring exceptions. Do we not have the right to complain when we are the ones negatively impacted? Even when these developments sit empty, parking lots brightly lit? It seems you don't support our right to peacefully enjoy the mountain setting that we moved to decades ago long before developers were even interested in the 285 corridor. Are you a developer Viking? Do you work for one? You seem vehement in defending their rights over the rights of individuals. Or perhaps you simply so dislike Ladyjazzer that you will attack her even when her stances are reasonable and nonpolitical.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 18:16 #57 by Hoot Owl

lionshead2010 wrote: I know that the people working those jobs REALLY need them for the most part and if they don't really need them then they should step aside so local teens can have the jobs currently being worked by adults.

[/color][/b]
Really? If they dont need the jobs they should step aside for other adults that are raising teens, and are currently unemployed. Sounds like your teen must not have had a job this past summer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 18:18 #58 by LadyJazzer
Perhaps if he likes light pollution so much, HE could move down to Denver and find even more of it? If he likes developer's rights so much, he can move down into one of those cookie-cutter areas of Highlands Ranch or Alameda @ C470, and suck up next to one?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 18:27 #59 by chickaree
Some of us moved here long ago to enjoy the fresh air, beautiful surroundings, wildlife, brilliant night skies and the ability to control our surroundings without HOAS, noisy neighbors and blowing trash. Little did we expect that our planning and zoning boards could be so corrupt.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2011 18:59 #60 by The Viking

chickaree wrote: Some of us moved here long ago to enjoy the fresh air, beautiful surroundings, wildlife, brilliant night skies and the ability to control our surroundings without HOAS, noisy neighbors and blowing trash. Little did we expect that our planning and zoning boards could be so corrupt.


How are they corrupt? Can you posts specifics and proof? Looking forward to reading them. But no I am not a developer and I do not work for one.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.223 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+