Because even the hardcore lefties that ARGUE IN FAVOR of banning military style weapons (and don't seem to realize that they're also against tons of shotguns & pistols, etc, etc...but silly me) don't realize that a crazed maniac will do something even MORE ****** up to achieve their ****** up goals.
Jekyll wrote: Still ignoring Dianne Feinstein. Silly little girl.
Off topic: Did you spend the Holidays stewing on here?
Let me know when you find a piece of legislation that Feinstein has tried to pass IN THIS CONGRESS that says "they're coming to take away your guns." By the way, how many guns were taken away in Obama's first 4 years?... I don't remember seeing that...
So, here it is again, since you obviously are ignoring it....
Wow... Since nobody has said that they were planning "to come take anybody's guns", it's good to know that the usual gun-nuts are dead-set against it. (Kind of like "Sharia Law" and "Agenda 21"...)
Slippery Slope: in Britain, they first created a registration system, like Sen. Feinstein has in her AWB. Hers would even include handguns.
Once they have this database, then they can make illegal certain guns, like Britain did. Semi-Auto AR's are illegal, so you can only own single shot versions in the UK, and handguns were declared illegal and melted down, including historical ones over a century old.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I'll take that to mean, "NO, I don't have ANY proof--other than my paranoia--that ANYBODY is going to do any such thing." (In fact a "National Gun Registry" has been struck down...) So, since you seem to still have that pesky reading-comprehension problem, I'll post my question again:
Let me know when you find a piece of legislation that Feinstein has tried to pass IN THIS CONGRESS that says "they're coming to take away your guns." By the way, how many guns were taken away in Obama's first 4 years?... I don't remember seeing that...
So, here it is again, since you obviously are ignoring it....
Wow... Since nobody has said that they were planning "to come take anybody's guns", it's good to know that the usual gun-nuts are dead-set against it. (Kind of like "Sharia Law" and "Agenda 21"...)
LadyJazzer wrote: Wow... Since nobody has said that they were planning "to come take anybody's guns", it's good to know that the usual gun-nuts are dead-set against it. (Kind of like "Sharia Law" and "Agenda 21"...)
Just add this to your signature line, then you wont have to repeat yourself. It will give you time to come up with new material
Actually I am less worried about the California Senator with her own CCW than I am Hickenlooper with a Dem statehouse. And the Gov will pass feel good legislation that the good guys like me will follow meanwhile the bad guys won't.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
LadyJazzer wrote: Wow... Since nobody has said that they were planning "to come take anybody's guns", it's good to know that the usual gun-nuts are dead-set against it. (Kind of like "Sharia Law" and "Agenda 21"...)
Just add this to your signature line, then you wont have to repeat yourself. It will give you time to come up with new material
Gee, still no answer to my question: Let me know when you find a piece of legislation that Feinstein (or any other Senator) has tried to pass IN THIS CONGRESS that says "they're coming to take away your guns." By the way, how many guns were taken away in Obama's first 4 years?... I don't remember seeing that...
Since you guys seem to be incapable of responding to the question with anything other than the usual bat-sh*t-crazy paranoia "slippery-slope" crap, I guess I'll keep asking....