archer wrote: Its precisely because Fred has refused to give sources for his many claims that I posted that. When I get responses to my requests for sources I will start giving sources of my own. So rick.....talk to your own side before you get snarky with me.
archer wrote: Its precisely because Fred has refused to give sources for his many claims that I posted that. When I get responses to my requests for sources I will start giving sources of my own. So rick.....talk to your own side before you get snarky with me.
And why exactly should people police their own side? You really want your allies to moderate you? Should LJ have the right to delete and modify your posts?
Is Dog your keeper?
Just kidding! :splat:
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
archer wrote: Its precisely because Fred has refused to give sources for his many claims that I posted that. When I get responses to my requests for sources I will start giving sources of my own. So rick.....talk to your own side before you get snarky with me.
And why exactly should people police their own side? You really want your allies to moderate you?
It isn't a case of people policing their own side....but it is pretty hypocritical to demand from the other side what your own side is unwilling to give.
Should LJ have the right to delete and modify your posts?
Who said anything about deleting or modifying posts? only you.
Is Dog your keeper?
I have two Cavalier King Charles Spaniels, and yes, they are my keepers.
archer wrote: Its precisely because Fred has refused to give sources for his many claims that I posted that. When I get responses to my requests for sources I will start giving sources of my own. So rick.....talk to your own side before you get snarky with me.
My main point was addressing this:
Since nearly half the population hates him because of who he is, not what he has done
This is the statement I have a problem with. You can't backup this claim and it's exactly the kind of statement you've complained about in the past, over and over when a non-Democrat/liberal makes a mind reading blanket statement.
What did you mean by "who he is"? And how could you possibly know half the population HATES him? Did you hate Bush or did you just vehemently disagree with his words and actions? My guess is that you THINK
half the population hates him because he's black and I would say you are wrong.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
:thumbsup: 
:rofllol
