Then blame the home town hospital, I lost my doctors when Rocky Mountain Health Plans decided not to allow their clients to see a doctor who also ran an emergency clinic....never could figure that one out. Also had a doc here who decided not to take any insurance at all....again had to change docs. No one wants to be even slightly inconvenienced in order for people who have been shut out of the health insurance industry to finally get insurance, and I'm not talking just about the poor, or low income, I'm talking about people with pre existing conditions, those who have been canceled because of sickness, young people who have already gone through their life time max.....sure, let them suffer so you....or someone from concord can drive 10 minutes instead of 15, and blame Obamacare and not the hospital that made the decision. I wonder if they take Medicare.
What a selfish, self centered nation we have become.
archer wrote: Then blame the home town hospital, I lost my doctors when Rocky Mountain Health Plans decided not to allow their clients to see a doctor who also ran an emergency clinic....never could figure that one out. Also had a doc here who decided not to take any insurance at all....again had to change docs. No one wants to be even slightly inconvenienced in order for people who have been shut out of the health insurance industry to finally get insurance, and I'm not talking just about the poor, or low income, I'm talking about people with pre existing conditions, those who have been canceled because of sickness, young people who have already gone through their life time max.....sure, let them suffer so you....or someone from concord can drive 10 minutes instead of 15, and blame Obamacare and not the hospital that made the decision. I wonder if they take Medicare.
What a selfish, self centered nation we have become.
But archer, don't you think it would have been much simpler and cheaper just to make the ACA for those who can''t afford insurance and allow the rest of us to keep what we want, what we chose in the first place? Millions are going to lose the doctors they're comfortable with and policies they can afford... because the handful of people in Washington thinks they know whats best for us, for 300 million Americans.
What a trusting herd of sheep "we" have become.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
archer wrote: ...No one wants to be even slightly inconvenienced in order for people who have been shut out of the health insurance industry to finally get insurance....
What a selfish, self centered nation we have become.
Are you serious? "slightly inconvenienced"? Did you read any of the links I actually provided that you normally complain about?
1. Someone has an pre-Obama existing individual policy from Anthem or any insurer in NH for the Concord Hospital.
2. Dec. 31 all non-Obama approved policies are cancelled. (except a few pre-2010 grandfathered plans)
3. Only One insurer Anthem is approved on Obamacare in NH for 2014 and that is your only option to buy new insurance and avoid a penalty, and your local Hospital won't accept that Anthem ACA insurance.
Minor inconvenience? Why couldn't they have an option to retain their 2010 2011 2012 2013 plan and doctor?
If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2
Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.
They thought medicare was what was best for us, and they essentially were right. Too bad we couldn't have medicare for all, but in their misguided attempt to get support from Republicans, the Democrats gave them what they asked for and still didn't get their support. If you all don't like what you got, where is the Republican plan that covers the low income families, and pre existing conditions, and preventive medicine, and eliminates lifetime caps, and protects people from being cancelled when they get sick? Y'all got one?
Would any of the folks seeking coverage have to show a Government issued photo ID to gain coverage? Seems to me that not that long ago there were some discussions about how inconvenient it was for some people to get a Government issued ID for free, other than the time it takes to get the ID, in order to vote... And that would take place at their local polling place, not 20 miles down the road.
Having to identify yourself to get healthcare must be different than having to do so to vote...
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
LOL, you are placing blame wbere, politically, you want to place it, not necessarily where it belongs. If other insurers arent interested in Concord, but write policies elsewhere in NH, why? If the hospital won't take Anthem, why? Got the answers to those questions?
I read your links but apparently you don't read my posts. My question is why don't any other insurers cover Concord or NH, and why the hospital decided not to accept their policies.....do they accept any insurance, or Medicare. If that was in your links I must have missed that part. Your condescension is duly noted.
......and your link from NH is out of date, written before the policies were made available, based on speculation, and the CNN article got out wrong, Concord is not 25 miles from Manchester, even Google makes it 17 miles, hardly a long trek for New Hampshire people, of which my mom was one.
Having to identify yourself to get healthcare must be different than having to do so to vote... 
