From the IRS to the NSA, Americans have reasons not to trust

[youtube:sa42p6jx][/youtube:sa42p6jx]

Sort of like the " 18-minute gap " of the Nixon tapes... Or the missing documents on Bush's AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard... ("Dang... Now, where'd I put that...?")

The IRS admitted yesterday they didn't honor the subpoena. Of course, Holder's Department of Justice won't do anything about it.

LadyJazzer wrote: Sort of like the " 18-minute gap " of the Nixon tapes... Or the missing documents on Bush's AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard... ("Dang... Now, where'd I put that...?")

Yes, "sort of like" that. And a good thing those thing happened, too, because that make it OK that these Lois Lerner emails were deleted. They did it and we did it, so now everything is all "even-steven".

Mary Scott wrote: Yes, "sort of like" that. And a good thing those thing happened, too, because that make it OK that these Lois Lerner emails were deleted. They did it and we did it, so now everything is all "even-steven".

..and lies about WMDs, and lies about...

Selective-outrage is a beautiful (and hypocritical) thing, isn't it?

Tape? 8 track or cassettes. LOL

"Transparency experts" The booming career for the retrained American worker.

LadyJazzer wrote:

Mary Scott wrote: Yes, "sort of like" that. And a good thing those thing happened, too, because that make it OK that these Lois Lerner emails were deleted. They did it and we did it, so now everything is all "even-steven".

..and lies about WMDs, and lies about...

Selective-outrage is a beautiful (and hypocritical) thing, isn't it?

:Confused: So your only defense of this corrupt administration is to point out past corrupt administrations? :rofllol I thought you would go with the talking point that Lois Lerner was right in selectively going after right win organizations because they are more likely to cheat.

Like how the Clintons use trusts to avoid death taxes while advocating for higher estate penalties. lol Those rich people should pay more taxes while we are dodging them ourselves.

FredHayek wrote: :Confused: So your only defense of this corrupt administration is to point out past corrupt administrations? :rofllol I thought you would go with the talking point that Lois Lerner was right in selectively going after right win organizations because they are more likely to cheat.

Actually, the IRS WAS right to look into 501's for evidence of cheating--That's their job. And since it is provably true that they did it on BOTH sides of the political spectrum, (and since it is also provably true that they did NOT deny any applications from conservative groups, while they DID deny some liberal groups), your selective outrage is again duly noted--and filed in the appropriate nearest round container.

Probably? OK. #mosttransparantadministrationever

FredHayek wrote: Probably? OK. #mosttransparantadministrationever

Still having trouble with reading comprehension, Fred? I said "PROVABLY"...not "probably"...

But, hey, it's got a lot of the same letters in it.


#tooinformedtovoterepublican