YOU KNOW ALL THAT MONEY THAT WENT OUT THE DOOR in 2008....WTWAWKI was blowing up, do tell me WHERE ALL THAT $$$ WENT TO??? To the executives of the banks we bailed out,certainly NOT
to the people, and OH BY THE WAY,WELLS FARGO AND THE THE REST OF THE BANKING "bosses"
did they go to jail,did ANYONE GO TOO JAIL FOR THE FUBAR....let me give U the answer...NO...and WHY was that??? enough said....
Please try and make sense. It is not enough said if you don't have a point. What is the point of your rant? That Obama wasted a lot of money on banks? Yeah, we all know that. (it was 2009, not 2008). Bush was the culprit of the great theft? Yeah we all knew that too. Did anyone ever ask what happened to the money that the pentagon annonced was lost on 9/10/2001? How much was that again? Not sure what any of this has to do with Biden and tax hikes instead of spending cuts though.
Pony Soldier wrote: Please try and make sense. It is not enough said if you don't have a point. What is the point of your rant? That Obama wasted a lot of money on banks? Yeah, we all know that. (it was 2009, not 2008). Bush was the culprit of the great theft? Yeah we all knew that too. Did anyone ever ask what happened to the money that the pentagon annonced was lost on 9/10/2001? How much was that again? Not sure what any of this has to do with Biden and tax hikes instead of spending cuts though.
SORRY BUCKO....that was done on the R'S WATCH. O inherited the fubar's aftermath.
HA,
What do you mean by “FAIR SHARE”? Does that mean a percentage of income or profits? Do you mean that everyone should pay a share of what it costs to fund the government?
Please define you terms.
CLOSE THE DAMN LOOP HOLES....when billionaires can claim $750 as a FAIRSHARE tax, we have a HUGE problem Huston......I personally advocate for a flat tax,but when ultra wealthy rich can pay next to nothing or nothing (because of loss)...there needs to be a revision of rules and regs.
My reading of your response is that you are proponent of a flat
tax. Is that correct?
This is the definition of a flat tax. Do you agree?
Definition of a Flat Tax. The Flat Tax system is a mechanism in which the same rate of tax is applied to every individual irrespective of their income levels. Also, no deductions or exemptions are allowed in this tax system. In this tax system, the person earning higher wages does not fall into a higher tax bracket, so this system gives incentives to people with higher wages.
Flat Tax (Definition, Examples) | Pros & Cons of Flat ...
www.wallstreetmojo.com/flat-tax
Once again you use the terminology " FAIRSHARE tax". what does that mean?
The flat tax system is a good system and easier to monitors; however, its regressive nature does not go well with many politicians and economists. To make it progressive in nature, a flat tax rate should be introduced with certain exemptions and deductions available to the lower-income group. In that way, the government would be able to justify that lower-income group people are being taxed less as compared to higher-income group people, and that way, the acceptance will be easier. In many countries there has been a significant increase in tax collection after the introduction of a flat tax system, Russia is one. So, we see that if implemented carefully after appropriate analysis, this system can be beneficial for people, government, and country. Also, the straight forward nature of this system makes it easier to comply with and make tax planning and filling easier for individuals and corporations.
THANK U for the link...the above is the structure that seems the fairest. ''fairshare" to me, means NO
loopholes,skirting the laws,U pay the CORRECT amount,relative to your income....($750 for a BILLIONAIRE is absurd)....AGAIN the regs. need revision for "FAIR" TO OCCUR.