Is Snopes.com Biased?

Look closely at what you think is his birth certificate, which in fact is nothing more than a registration of live birth and it is stamped Received. Why? Excuses are great to make your selves feel good, but how about some actual answers?

Answer the points I made about the video you posted first. You still haven't responded, just moved on to a new talking point.

But the quick answer to your last question is, "Because that's what the State of Hawaii gives out to show they have a legal record of birth on file."

The longer answer: The computer-generated Certification of Live Birth is the only kind of birth record currently issued by the state (original records are stored electronically). When a Hawaii citizen requests a certified copy of his or her birth certificate from the state, a Certification of Live Birth — what people are calling a "short-form" — is what they get. I don't see the "scanned" stamp you are speaking of. Any way you could provide a photo?

Do you really have such contempt for the United States that you think it could be fooled into certifying the candidacy of a presidential candidate with a forged birth certificate?

No, I have contempt for those who wish to cover this up. I have contempt for the drive-by mainstream media that has been complicit in this cover-up.

This short form you refer to is not what my cousin has as a copy of her son's birth in the same damn hospital on the same day.

If you don't have contempt for the United States, how can you argue the greatest nation in the world was duped by a forged birth certificate for the highest office in the land?

You DO know how the mainstream media works, don't you? They constantly try to scoop one another with the biggest story they can.

Would this not be the greatest story in the history of the United States if it were true? I can't imagine a reporter type not jumping on this if it were true.

I guess you're not going to answer my points about the stupid video you posted.

It shows your integrity.

This whole argument is incredibly stupid...if there was a hint, a glimmer of a chance, a minute iota that this was true Sarah Palin would be all over it.

I think Sarah has more important, at least to her, fish to fry

This has to be the worlds stupidest argument. It's like arguing for an earth-centric universe. Please folks, you just look sadly ridiculous.

jf1acai wrote: I think Sarah has more important, at least to her, fish to fry

Well she took the time to call Barbara Bush a blueblood (I guess that is a slam) and chastize Michelle Obama for trying to encourage kids to eat healthy. Woman has altogether too much time on her hands.

jf1acai wrote: I think Sarah has more important, at least to her, fish to fry

Yeah, making more money. It's the American Way.