- Posts: 2050
- Thank you received: 0
As for you frogger, please tell me how you know that SC has never betrayed the privacy clauses of this website? You have some inside factual information?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
She should not be giving anyone a head's up about who anyone is on this site.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Ridgeway, I don't even know who you are, so I couldn't tell anyone if I tried. And the same goes for most of the other 2,287 members of this site. So to answer your question, NO I do not.RidgeWay wrote: SC this is a question for you. I would give some background information but then it would indicate who it was from. And I would do this privately but it really affects more than me.
I am only including the most pertinent part from a person who is a staunch supporter of you and believes s/he knows who users on this site are. "People forget that Sharon and myself are friends and she is capable of giving me certain heads up without breaching the privacy to My Mountain Town users." A heads up about what? As you yourself state, it's apparently without breaching privacy, so what's the problem?
Is that true SC? Are you giving people a heads up as to who people might be? Are you sharing with your husband or your close confidant frogger who keeps talking about being privy to everything that is going on? Is that why she has been so abysmally bad to deal with because she thinks I am someone she may know, she is mistaken, and doesn't like? I have not always understood her meanness. And how does this not breach the privacy of MyMountainTown users?
I await your reply.
My first post was communication vetted by my lawyer, and posted with her approval and endorsement. So, again, you are making incorrect assumptions and coming to conclusions that are false. I appreciate that you believe this should have been kept private, and as I've said before, that's how I was handling this until Robin did what she did. Everything else I've said and done is to protect my business, or maybe you think I should have walked away from the investment. Either way, we will have to agree to disagree on how it's being handled. You are welcome to post your opinion, as is everyone else, and just because someone disagrees with you does not make them "creepy", "mean", or "nasty" - they are entitled to post their opinion as well. I've not continued bashing in this thread, I've only answered questions that come up. Nor has my husband even posted on this issue in months, yet you continue to refer to him as well, reference his months-old posts, and to call him creepy when you don't even know him.RidgeWay wrote: homeagain, This issue affects all people on this website. I would rather this question be addressed out in the open so that there isn't any he said, she said. And others have an opportunity to read it.
By frogger's own words in another thread she is privy to everything that has been going on regarding the dispute with CG and can recite chapter and verse. Isn't that a breach right there by SC? SC is the one that posted this thread regarding the dispute. If she can breach in the legal dispute, then it follows that she can breach with her 'friends' as indicated by the person I quoted. I am not the one who made the comment, pretty much calling SC scum. And your proof that frogger is privy to everything? I can assure you that she is absolutely NOT - I know some facts that would curl her toes but haven't shared because it is, at the moment, still private. She has posted her opinion based on what she's seen posted publicly and what she knows of the people involved from first-hand getting to know them before this situation even started.
I would like to know what she plans to do about any breaches or perceived breaches. It goes to her character as a business person. As absolutely nothing's been proven concerning breaches of contract, at this point it's merely hearsay and speculation. I can claim that I didn't, but until a jury decides, even that is only my opinion. And your claim, or anyone else's claim that I did is hearsay.
Certainly your right homeagain to handle it any way you choose. Apparently there has been more than one breach with frogger knowing all of SC's business since she has talked to her incessantly about the issues. Now with another person indicating that he is getting information from SC clearly says there is an issue that affects everyone on this website. Again, assumptions. And unless you name who your source is, then it's hearsay, rumor, and speculation on your part.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Do No Harm
Search Out The Truth; Be Skeptical; Trust, But Verify
Hold People's Trust as Sacred
Act with Integrity so Trust Earned is Deserved
Be Honest, Bluntly So if Necessary, Tactfully Otherwise
Be Honorable
Be Consistent
Be Fair
Take A Stand, No Matter How Unpopular, if It's the Right Thing to Do
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.