- Posts: 2005
- Thank you received: 16
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
major bean wrote: ADHD. Any parent who would let their child be doped up is unloving and not fit to be a parent.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nmysys wrote: I hate to be a troublemaker but maybe SC and CG need to apologize to MB.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
AspenValley wrote:
Nmysys wrote: I hate to be a troublemaker but maybe SC and CG need to apologize to MB.
That's almost as clueless a statement as MB's original one.
Do you think that MB posting some random "anti-ADHD drug" crap somehow justifies denouncing parents of ADHD kids who have to use medication to have somewhat normal lives as "unloving" and "unfit"? In the past 30 years there have been about 30 different "theories" on the "causes" of ADHD from bad mothering to food additives, each and every one in its turn debunked after putting parents through needless expense, heartbreak, and disappointment. Not to mention the kids who have suffered while their parents believed in all these crackpot theories while their kids struggled in school, in relationships, and later, in the work world with their problems unaddressed.
Yes, ADHD is a controversial diagnosis. Yes, there are more kids placed on medication than should be. There are even kids who have been wrongly placed on medication that have been harmed by it. That does NOT make parents whose children require medication unfit, or unloving, and anyone who suggests they are is worse than clueless, they are a totally unfeeling, uninformed.....never mind.
And you think SC should APOLOGIZE to him? I'm amazed she was able to answer him so graciously, but in my opinion she not only wasted her graciousness, she was wasting her breath trying to educate someone who clearly only wants to hear his own point of view.
I guess you make one more to add to the ignore list....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ADHD Treatment - Why Choose Neurofeedback Over Drugs for Attention Deficit Disorder Treatment?
For 30 years the Drake Institute has made biofeedback or neurofeedback the centerpiece of our non drug ADHD treatment programs. There is a learning curve in acquiring clinical expertise in utilizing neurofeedback and biofeedback . Our having helped more than 11,000 patients over the past 30 years has produced a level of knowledge and clinical expertise that could not have been acquired in any other way.
For the past 2 decades, we committed to helping ADHD patients with our preferred non drug ADHD treatment. As a medical clinic we could prescribe medication for ADHD children, but for clinical effectiveness and safety we choose our non drug ADHD treatment.
Unlike drugs when used for ADHD treatment, neurofeedback used properly does not cause negative side effects. In addition, brainmap guided neurofeedback can produce long term improvements which drugs cannot. The drugs can only produce a short-lived improvement. Furthermore, brainmap guided neurofeedback is very empowering to the ADHD child, and helps restore their self esteem by enabling them to develop the neurological resources and skills necessary to succeed. Our clinical staff of therapists provides much needed support throughout the ADHD Treatment for the parents to facilitate the ADHD child's improvements integrating into their everyday lives.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
What exactly does CG need to apologize for Nmysys? It sounds like to me that she was trying to help MB explain his side, not knock him for it.CinnamonGirl wrote: I am not defending MB statement but thinking he didn't mean it the way it sounded?? Giving you the benefit of the doubt MB. Good opening if you want to retract your statement.
(My emphasis)- Summary and Implications -
Overall, these findings add to the research support for neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD. However, despite the many strengths of this study, there are concerns to note and reasons why some researchers will find a basis for criticizing it. The main concerns — and my own take on them — include the following:
It is important to remember that when improvement was defined as at least a 25% reduction in core ADHD symptoms, about 50% of children treated with neurofeedback did not meet this threshold. Thus, many children did not derive significant benefit from this treatment even though the benefits averaged across all children were statistically significant.
This is not surprising as no treatment — including medication — will help everyone. However, the rate of non-responders is less than what is typically found in controlled studies of medication treatment and this is important to remain aware of.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.