IT'S THE REPUBLICANS ECONOMY NOW

Vice Lord wrote:

lionshead2010 wrote: If Congress is at a standoff....who is the leader who is supposed to pull the fighters apart and sort it out? Who is the leader of this nation?

The House and Senate who are bought and paid for by corporate interests. My friend


http://www.publicampaign.org/

So the President gets a free ride here? Seriously?

Vice Lord wrote:

lionshead2010 wrote: If Congress is at a standoff....who is the leader who is supposed to pull the fighters apart and sort it out? Who is the leader of this nation?

The House and Senate who are bought and paid for by corporate interests. My friend


http://www.publicampaign.org/

Who is the man in charge? When in charge, take charge. Lead from the front. You konw...leadership stuff.

archer wrote: Hey...start dancing in the streets conservatives....you won
You set out to destroy this country and you have succeeded.

[youtube:39asu8t1][/youtube:39asu8t1]

lionshead2010 wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

lionshead2010 wrote: If Congress is at a standoff....who is the leader who is supposed to pull the fighters apart and sort it out? Who is the leader of this nation?

The House and Senate who are bought and paid for by corporate interests. My friend


http://www.publicampaign.org/

So the President gets a free ride here? Seriously?

He caved into the Hostage Takers demands..What should he have done? Yelled at them to make them sign a clean bill?

If the man was worthy of leading the greatest nation EVER...then he wouldn't have waited until the 11th hour to intervene and he would have negotiated tirelessly until the two sides could find common ground. This, ultimately, is a failure of leadership on the part of President Obama.

There are a lot of things in life I don't know much about....but I do know a fair amount about what it takes to be a leader and this man is no leader. We are now living with the results of his failure as a leader.

When you are a leader...the buck stops at your desk. You don't pass the buck.

Vice Lord wrote:
The S&P report did not mention intitlements, you did..

We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysi ... ative.aspx

lionshead2010 wrote: If the man was worthy of leading the greatest nation EVER...then he wouldn't have waited until the 11th hour to intervene and he would have negotiated tirelessly until the two sides could find common ground. This, ultimately, is a failure of leadership on the part of President Obama.

There are a lot of things in life I don't know much about....but I do know a fair amount about what it takes to be a leader and this man is no leader. We are now living with the results of his failure as a leader.

When you are a leader...the buck stops at your desk. You don't pass the buck.

Sorry, this is BS of the highest order. There is no way that Obama could have gotten those clowns in Congress to do anything other than what they did. They are a bunch of stubborn butt-heads who cared far more about "getting their way" than they did about the consequences of their silly tantrums. They have also heaped such disrespect on the President of the United States that they effectively made him powerless in this situation. And sorry, your precious Tea Partiers are who I am talking about. They actually were proud of themselves for being so stubborn, and this is the result. I hope they are happy.

AspenValley wrote:

lionshead2010 wrote: If the man was worthy of leading the greatest nation EVER...then he wouldn't have waited until the 11th hour to intervene and he would have negotiated tirelessly until the two sides could find common ground. This, ultimately, is a failure of leadership on the part of President Obama.

There are a lot of things in life I don't know much about....but I do know a fair amount about what it takes to be a leader and this man is no leader. We are now living with the results of his failure as a leader.

When you are a leader...the buck stops at your desk. You don't pass the buck.

Sorry, this is BS of the highest order. There is no way that Obama could have gotten those clowns in Congress to do anything other than what they did. They are a bunch of stubborn butt-heads who cared far more about "getting their way" than they did about the consequences of their silly tantrums. They have also heaped such disrespect on the President of the United States that they effectively made him powerless in this situation. And sorry, your precious Tea Partiers are who I am talking about. They actually were proud of themselves for being so stubborn, and this is the result. I hope they are happy.

So I'll ask you, please, who is in charge of the nation right now? I'll give you a hint, it's not George Bush.

2012 is looking good for Democrats now. Nothing energizes the liberal base like Republicans trashing the economy and the countrys future with arrogant disregard for American citizens.

AspenValley wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:
The S&P report did not mention intitlements, you did..

We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysi ... ative.aspx

Well F- them..

Then

I'm not gonna parrot those wall street scumbags