- Posts: 30810
- Thank you received: 179
LOL wrote: I still think it was a subtle message to guilt people into accepting higher tax rates at the top end. You owe something back, more than today's rates, even though businesses pay higher property taxes, and generate lots of sales and payroll taxes already. Not to mention healthcare and other bennies. Don't re-invest profits in growing your business, send them to Obama instead. LOL
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
That was my thought after re-reading through the transcript. Either that, or Obama did a piss-poor job of reading the speech as it was written and shouldn't be allowed to improvise.Nobody that matters wrote:
Science Chic wrote: I think he was trying to make the audience feel connected with one another, to remind people of the ties that bind a community and a country, not slam on small business owners...
If that's what he was shooting for, there's a speech writer somewhere that desperately needs to be fired.
rofllol No political affiliation required to help/discriminated against here, and don't worry, I'll protect your reputation...what little of it is left.The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
Science Chic wrote: You ran out the door too fast!
I offered to help... eek... did I just out myself as a closet liberal?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
Science Chic wrote: You ran out the door too fast!
I offered to help... eek... did I just out myself as a closet liberal?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Martin Ent Inc wrote: If Obama had a pet frog he could not connect with it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blazer Bob wrote: I can not disagree with much of what you said. The question is do we have 10 years. The US will probably bail out California but there is no one to bail out the US. My hope is that the tea party contingent becomes strong enough to hold Romney's feet to the fire.
on that note wrote: If my strategy is to get Obama out, then I should vote for Romney, but that is not my goal in this election, though it is one of my desires.
My political goal is to get freedom in business and my personal life. Voting for either flavor of heavy control won't get me to my goal.
We need to wake people up to realize that govt does not have the solutions to our problems, we do. We just need them to protect basic liberties and contracts and the rest we will optimize.
Since Obama wants to fix everything with govt influence and new ideas, I cannot vote for him. Also the rampant jailing of citizens etc. disqualify him.
Since Romney wants to fix everything with govt influence and old ideas, I cannot vote for him. Also after living under him in MA and hearing his comments on govt control of things.
I agree that some of us may be better off in 2years if Romney is in. We will all be better off in 10 if we get people off this R/D control crap and simply reduce the size of govt so that we are not slowed down any more.
Our short sightedness got us here (Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter....), do we really think if we have the same arguments with the same options that we have been trying for decades that things will change. They will just be more of the same and Romney and Obama are only 1% different, which leaves 99% the same.
It's all just a little bit of history repeating, unless we don't repeat it.
Rinse, Lather, Repeat as needed.....it's not needed.
The biggest issues in the US right now is the number of citizens that are locked up, yet neither of these guys talk about this very much, they keep pretending like they are running the economy, when what they are running is the jails.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.