She went out and gave the talking points that were agreed to by the entire intelligence community as reflecting their unclassified views at the moment that she used those talking points.
What part of that are you having trouble understanding? Is it the part about "AS REFLECTING THEIR UNCLASSIFIED VIEWS AT THE MOMENT THAT SHE USED THOSE TALKING POINTS"...? I can explain it to you...But I can't understand it for you.
In the meantime, 4,780 US personnel died in Iraq because Bush and Condoleeza Rice LIED.
And I'm STILL waiting for PROOF that the President of the United States "lied"....
On here blaming Bush about sh*t again. What a surprise. Obama hasn't exactly "brought everyone home" HAS he? Yer a tired person that should go take a dirt nap already.
Edit: In case your EXTRA daft, I'm referring to you 4,780 personell comment. We went after some filty no good dirty rotten scum, and now we're stuck in it. Obama hasn't helped the sitch at ALL. Makin' it worse as per the usual.
She went out and gave the talking points that were agreed to by the entire intelligence community as reflecting their unclassified views at the moment that she used those talking points.
Eggsactly. Wow, Imagine that. She gave the info the intelligence community wanted out there because they didn't want to tip off the terrorists and have them scatter. But how can that be? Some on the right have already convicted her and the President before all the facts came out.
Raees wrote: [
Eggsactly. Wow, Imagine that. She gave the info the intelligence community wanted out there because they didn't want to tip off the terrorists and have them scatter. But how can that be? .
That is dumber than a typical TV plot. I am surprised that so many will pretend to believe it.
I didn't say I believed that explanation... I said I believed what was directly disclosed today from the closed Intelligence Committee hearing by one of the members.
Whether you believe it or not is not my problem... But feel free to continue your regurgitation of the rightie-blog / Stupid-bart / FauxNews drivel, and your baseless speculations.
archer wrote: I'm surprised that so many refuse to even consider the truth when they have no hard evidence to refute it.
They've already reached a conclusion in the matter. It's just a question of how to get there if the facts don't support it. In other words, they only believe what fits their pre-conceived conclusion.
(Somehow this sounds vaguely familiar... now what was it last time? I think it was last week. Something about Romney out in front and it would be Republican landslide?)
