Most of the Media MIA on "house of horrors"

Thanks, I'll look i to that, but here again, I have to "sift" through the bias and try to find the truth. It's not about finding a good aggregator- I use Google for that. It's finding a source that will supply information without slanting, omitting, implying, supporting or propagandizing.

Good luck with your hunt! Even deciding which stories are news reveals bias.

Blazer Bob wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: [“For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights. Whether you agree with abortion or not, I do think there’s a direct connection between the media’s failure to cover this and our own political commitments on the left. I think it’s a bad idea, I think it’s dangerous, but I think that’s the way it is.”

That's the topic of this thread. Can you address this statement above?

Well, progress is being made. We have moved on from the lefts contention that there was no media failure.

Not at all

No one is saying there has been no media coverage. Only that there was a media failure to cover it adequately.

"Adequately" by your definition, is your definition...

It was covered "adquately" according to mine.

LadyJazzer wrote: "Adequately" by your definition, is your definition...

It was covered "adquately" according to mine.

Has the Trayvon Martin case been adequately covered? So when the trial starts, should the media ignore it too?

Rick wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: "Adequately" by your definition, is your definition...

It was covered "adquately" according to mine.

Has the Trayvon Martin case been adequately covered? So when the trial starts, should the media ignore it too?

Which is it Rick....not adequately covering or ignoring? the "house of horrors" was NOT ignored....why would you equate that to ignoring Trayvon Martin?

LadyJazzer wrote: "Adequately" by your definition, is your definition...

It was covered "adquately" according to mine.

Here... your favorite source doesn't think so...

“For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights. Whether you agree with abortion or not, I do think there’s a direct connection between the media’s failure to cover this and our own political commitments on the left. I think it’s a bad idea, I think it’s dangerous, but I think that’s the way it is.”

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segmen ... 2d7f000710

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: "Adequately" by your definition, is your definition...

It was covered "adquately" according to mine.

Here... your favorite source doesn't think so...

“For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights. Whether you agree with abortion or not, I do think there’s a direct connection between the media’s failure to cover this and our own political commitments on the left. I think it’s a bad idea, I think it’s dangerous, but I think that’s the way it is.”

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segmen ... 2d7f000710

That must be a closet conservative :Whistle