I am now in CG 's Q.

14 Aug 2013 10:24 #111 by FOS
Replied by FOS on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
Repeating yourself again LJ?
You go post over there all you want. Some us can't anymore.
You see it as mud slinging......some of us seeing it as exposing a thief (IMO) to the bright light of the day.
A person in our community has been terribly wronged.
I for one will stand with her and fight for her.
Unfortunately in this sick world.....it appears one has to pay to be right and that is an expensive proposition for a young family.
It might be within reach if one were dealing with a rational person but alas.....
How about you loan the parties some money so they can duke it out behind the scenes at 200 bucks an hour.
I would encourage anyone who has any doubt as to SC's position to contact her.
Look at the actual facts. She has stated that she will share that info.
What has been done here is SOOOOO wrong and if I were another bound site.....I would be watching very carefully.
To CG....I have all my pm's from you printed and filed. Including those in which you threatened to contact my employer. I have documented your harassment and behavior well.
The truth is an affirmative defense to libel and slander so threaten all you want to silence me and others.
Cutting my access off came a bit to late. All you did was show your true colors.
So LJ.....take your supposed moral high ground right back with ya.
I will not sit and watch 2 years of someones blood, sweat and tears stolen or bastardized by someone who does not deserve it. The site was bought and paid for. SC did the hard work. It is hers to do as she pleases within reason.
CG....you have to quit trying to breast feed at some point. Cut the cord.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 10:26 #112 by Reverend Revelant

LadyJazzer wrote:

homeagain wrote:

MsMAM wrote:

ColoradoKathy wrote: Exactly, there's only so much time.
Is it possible for advertisers to simply terminate their services on the other site, then contract for them here instead? I realize that doesn't solve all the problems since there was the 3-year "lead" that concerns CS but at least there wouldn't be a "going forward" issue on the ads.


Our contracts are with SC. Not CB. She is stealing them as far as I'm concerned. Stop posting on her site, people. Ignore the nut and post here. She attacked her best bound site. No one should do business with her. Goodbye to her and good riddance.


Was wondering just WHEN people would digest this advice and act on it..... :smackshead:


Me too... But it seems to be much more fun to sling mud from here over to there... I, for one, would like to see this played out where it SHOULD be played-out---in private, between the parties and their attorneys. Dragging this out into the public view is petty, and hardly helpful for anyone. But folks are gonna do what they're gonna do.

Let the petty mud-slinging continue....


Just an observation; you've done your fair share of keeping the traffic up by posting "over there." I'm wondering if you're going to take this advice - find your alliances and stick with them.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 10:34 #113 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
Let the petty mud-slinging continue.... Considering the source, it's no surprise...

Yes, I'll repeat myself and post the same thing in both places for those who are only reading one source.

Get over it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 10:36 #114 by Reverend Revelant

LadyJazzer wrote: Let the petty mud-slinging continue.... Considering the source, it's no surprise...


Well... considering that remark above... welcome.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 10:49 #115 by FOS
Replied by FOS on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
LJ thinks she can't lose on this but beware LJ, you hold a completely different political view of the world from the interloper. What's next on the banning list?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 11:02 #116 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
No, I think you are a mud-slinging muckraker, who is currently wallowing in your favorite environment.

Let the petty mud-slinging continue....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 11:04 #117 by FOS
Replied by FOS on topic I am now in CG 's Q.

LadyJazzer wrote: No, I think you are a mud-slinging muckraker, who is currently wallowing in your favorite environment.

Let the petty mud-slinging continue....


From a pro.!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 11:22 #118 by ScienceChic
Replied by ScienceChic on topic I am now in CG 's Q.

ColoradoKathy wrote: I saw, but didn't understand the significance of, the Facebook page -- is it new?
Great to hear from ya, HA, will call.

No mud-slinging here, just evidence for everyone to see.

The original and true 285Bound/MyMountainTown facebook page with over 1,000 Likes for which Communities Bound once congratulated us . Scroll down and you'll see nearly a 3 year history with multiple links to 285Bound.com before we transferred here.
File Attachment:


The Facebook page that is now linked to from the Home Page of 285Bound.com and is NOT under my admin control. Notice it has only 3 Likes and just joined facebook, even though there is already a 285Bound.com Facebook page in existence.
File Attachment:


Joined July 27, 2013
File Attachment:


SmokyHillBound Likes the 285Bound.com/MyMountainTown FB Page not the new 285Bound page:
File Attachment:


EvergreenBound Likes the 285Bound.com/MyMountainTown FB Page, not the new 285Bound page:
File Attachment:


CastleRockBound Likes the 285Bound.com/MyMountainTown FB Page, not the new 285Bound page:
File Attachment:


Communities Bound does not Like any 285Bound facebook page (even though they used to):
File Attachment:



Twitter account now linked to from 285Bound.com Home Page that is NOT under my admin control and every post contains links that go back to 285bound.com, which is also not under my control.
File Attachment:


First posts: August 2, 2013
File Attachment:


The original and true 285Bound/MyMountainTown Twitter account with 726 Followers and over 1,500 Tweets. Again, scroll down and you'll see a long history of links to 285Bound before we transferred here.
File Attachment:


The YouTube Channel that is linked to on the 285Bound.com Home Page is still my account and those videos on there are ABSOLUTELY my intellectual property - I filmed almost every single one of those, processed them all in my iMovie software, and uploaded them all. http://www.youtube.com/user/285Bound I'm still in the process of changing our information with Google. (If you have a YouTube account as well, please let me know so I can Subscribe to yours if you'd like and please Subscribe to our Channel if you'd like to be notified when new videos are uploaded. Thanks!).

**Edit to add: the first link in the thread about making it to 1,000 Likes that goes to facebook.com/285Bound goes to the imposter page because I changed the title of the page, thus making available the term "285Bound" so it could be re-used again (wasn't expecting that to be done to me, same thing with the Twitter account). That link used to go to what is now the MyMountainTown Facebook page, formerly the 285Bound page. Just to clear up any potential confusion.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 11:59 #119 by BuyersAgent
Replied by BuyersAgent on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
"Just to clear up any potential confusion." lol

It's hoped the Facebook changes make sense to everybody else -- I get the gist of it, which is that instead of being cooperative the "Bound" folks are no longer "liking" SC's enterprise on those website pages.

After once getting onto Facebook and reading a comment from one of the kids to the effect that "My mom is ruining my life," I don't look anymore. In turn, the kid complained of a breach of privacy and rightfully mentioned her mom had never been on before, so how would she know to be careful?

In the same vein -- is it fiscally important to your operations, CS, what the Facebook pages say? or are you just monitoring this by way of determining the extent of cooperation and good faith you're (apparently not) experiencing, and feeling discouraged because of the "changes?" If it's the latter, I'd suggest you take my path and just don't look!~ sometimes ignorance really is bliss -- plus, it sounds as though the community is behind you no matter what Facebook says. But then, I don't understand how revenue is generated from the sites and appreciate your concern that the links don't direct viewers where they should be going based on your agreement with CG, the Bound entity itself, or whatever.

Kathy G. Hansen
Broker/Owner
COLORADO HIGHLIGHTS REALTY
303-761-4046

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Aug 2013 13:07 #120 by ScienceChic
Replied by ScienceChic on topic I am now in CG 's Q.
Same as with the redirect, the issue is driving traffic to the website. The primary use of social media for most businesses is to drive traffic back to their websites with teasers and links for more info. The quantifiable value in a website (or any business) is in the number of members/patrons and amount of traffic that it has. I do not have any problem with the content posted, the problem is that 285Bound is still my business, those "285Bound" pages are not being run by me, and they are redirecting back to a site that should still be under my control but isn't, due to a violation of the contract terms on the part of Communities Bound.

If all of a sudden there were posts on those social media sites that slander people, is porn, illegal content, etc I have no way to remove that content and yet it would reflect badly on me as that's my business name. And as they are representations of my business and are meant to drive traffic back to a site that should be under my control as I rightfully paid for it, then it is damaging my business because it's taking traffic away from here where it rightly belongs.

Before the transfer, we were running about 12,000 unique visitors/month to the site. Due to 285bound.com not being redirected, MyMountainTown.com is down to ~2,000 unique visitors/month (although we are kicking ass way better than we've ever done in terms of average time each person spends on the site, how many pages are being viewed, and how few of people are leaving after coming in to view an initial page). Businesses advertise here because they believe they will get lots of views that will translate into actual business - Return On Investment. Less traffic could mean they are less likely to continue advertising.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.167 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+