- Posts: 5082
- Thank you received: 34
And that's precisely what CG did, isn't it. Take what was a private dispute and make it a public one by locking out the person she sold the site to and putting it back up without any input from, or the approval of, the rightful owner of the site who has a contract that was signed by both parties when the site was sold to her. The only reason that it is a public matter is because CG decided to make it a public matter. Had it been handled as it SHOULD have been handled it would still be a private matter instead of a public one. For once I completely agree with you, CG acted in a completely petty and immature manner in making what was, and what should have remained, a private matter a public one.LadyJazzer wrote:
homeagain wrote:
MsMAM wrote:
ColoradoKathy wrote: Exactly, there's only so much time.
Is it possible for advertisers to simply terminate their services on the other site, then contract for them here instead? I realize that doesn't solve all the problems since there was the 3-year "lead" that concerns CS but at least there wouldn't be a "going forward" issue on the ads.
Our contracts are with SC. Not CB. She is stealing them as far as I'm concerned. Stop posting on her site, people. Ignore the nut and post here. She attacked her best bound site. No one should do business with her. Goodbye to her and good riddance.
Was wondering just WHEN people would digest this advice and act on it.....
Me too... But it seems to be much more fun to sling mud from here over to there... I, for one, would like to see this played out where it SHOULD be played-out---in private, between the parties and their attorneys. Dragging this out into the public view is petty, and hardly helpful for anyone. But folks are gonna do what they're gonna do.
Let the petty mud-slinging continue....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
MsMAM wrote: And LJ knows me. I totally agree with PS in that this dispute costs money. I, for one, am paying advertising up front to SC to fight what I see as an injustice. LJ, you, of course, can do as you please, but know I've been thru all of this as an advertiser. She is wrong. SC is correct in her actions. She also started a place away from pinecam's asshole mods. My loyalty lies with her.
Post away over there. None of us are playing with her anymore. Go play with them.
I, for one, am not visiting her site or doing any more. I helped build it with trash pickups and volunteering. I can certainly help drag it down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Jazzer knows me too, so well in fact that she has decided her opinions in life will be easier to hang onto if she doesn't have to read what I post. lolMsMAM wrote: And LJ knows me. I totally agree with PS in that this dispute costs money. I, for one, am paying advertising up front to SC to fight what I see as an injustice. LJ, you, of course, can do as you please, but know I've been thru all of this as an advertiser. She is wrong. SC is correct in her actions. She also started a place away from pinecam's asshole mods. My loyalty lies with her.
Post away over there. None of us are playing with her anymore. Go play with them.
I, for one, am not visiting her site or doing any more. I helped build it with trash pickups and volunteering. I can certainly help drag it down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
She ignores those who she can not defeat in an argument.PrintSmith wrote:
Jazzer knows me too, so well in fact that she has decided her opinions in life will be easier to hang onto if she doesn't have to read what I post. lolMsMAM wrote: And LJ knows me. I totally agree with PS in that this dispute costs money. I, for one, am paying advertising up front to SC to fight what I see as an injustice. LJ, you, of course, can do as you please, but know I've been thru all of this as an advertiser. She is wrong. SC is correct in her actions. She also started a place away from pinecam's asshole mods. My loyalty lies with her.
Post away over there. None of us are playing with her anymore. Go play with them.
I, for one, am not visiting her site or doing any more. I helped build it with trash pickups and volunteering. I can certainly help drag it down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: As I have said over and over again, I don't have a dog in this fight, and I'm not "taking sides."
If people are going to sling mud in public, they're gonna do what they're gonna do. I still prefer to let the parties deal with it privately instead of airing their laundry in public.
So, let the mudslinging continue...:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: As I have said over and over again, I don't have a dog in this fight, and I'm not "taking sides."
If people are going to sling mud in public, they're gonna do what they're gonna do. I still prefer to let the parties deal with it privately instead of airing their laundry in public.
So, let the mudslinging continue...:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote:
homeagain wrote:
MsMAM wrote:
ColoradoKathy wrote: Exactly, there's only so much time.
Is it possible for advertisers to simply terminate their services on the other site, then contract for them here instead? I realize that doesn't solve all the problems since there was the 3-year "lead" that concerns CS but at least there wouldn't be a "going forward" issue on the ads.
Our contracts are with SC. Not CB. She is stealing them as far as I'm concerned. Stop posting on her site, people. Ignore the nut and post here. She attacked her best bound site. No one should do business with her. Goodbye to her and good riddance.
Was wondering just WHEN people would digest this advice and act on it.....
Me too... But it seems to be much more fun to sling mud from here over to there... I, for one, would like to see this played out where it SHOULD be played-out---in private, between the parties and their attorneys. Dragging this out into the public view is petty, and hardly helpful for anyone. But folks are gonna do what they're gonna do.
Let the petty mud-slinging continue....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.